Team\+ ProApplication · Teamplus

CVE-2024-9921

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-10-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 14.0.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Team+ from TEAMPLUS TECHNOLOGY does not properly validate specific page parameter, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands to read, modify and delete database contents.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Team+ from TEAMPLUS TECHNOLOGY contains a critical SQL injection vulnerability in a specific page parameter that lacks proper input validation. Unauthenticated remote attackers can inject arbitrary SQL commands through this parameter, enabling full database compromise including read, modification, and deletion of data.

MitigationApply vendor patch immediately to address the SQL injection vulnerability. If no patch is available, implement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database operations and add input validation for the affected parameter.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Team\+ ProApplication
Affected:>= 13.5.0, < 14.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Team+ Pro version
    Locate the Team+ Pro installation and retrieve its version number, typically found in the application about page, installation directory, or by querying the application's built-in version information.
    Affected if The installed version is 13.5.0 or higher but lower than 14.0.0
  2. Verify the Team+ Pro web interface is accessible
    Confirm that the Team+ Pro web application is running and network-accessible, typically on ports 80/443 or a configured web server port.
    Affected if The web interface is exposed and reachable on the network
  3. Identify database-connected pages accessible without authentication
    Review the Team+ Pro web application for pages that interact with the database and are accessible to unauthenticated users, focusing on parameters that accept user input.
    Affected if Unauthenticated-accessible database-interacting endpoints exist that do not use parameterized queries or input validation

If Team+ Pro version is 13.5.0 or higher but below 14.0.0 and the web interface is network-accessible, the environment is potentially affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 14.0.0 or later
Fixed in 14.0.0
Interim mitigation

Apply vendor patch immediately to address the SQL injection vulnerability. If no patch is available, implement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database operations and add input validation for the affected parameter.

Recommended fix High confidence

14.0.0

  1. Verify current Team+ Pro version by accessing the admin console or checking system information
  2. Backup the current database and configuration files
  3. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
  4. Download Team+ Pro version 14.0.0 or later from the official vendor source
  5. Stop the Team+ Pro service before applying the upgrade
  6. Follow the vendor's standard upgrade procedure to install version 14.0.0
  7. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number
  8. Restart the Team+ Pro service

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Team\+ Pro Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-9921 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-9921 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data