CVE-2022-35221
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTeamplus Pro community discussion has an ‘allocation of resource without limits or throttling’ vulnerability on thread subject field. A remote attacker with general user privilege posting a thread subject with large content can cause the server to allocate too much memory, leading to missing partial post content and disrupt partial service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceTeamplus Pro community discussion lacks input validation on the thread subject field. An authenticated user can submit an excessively large subject value, causing the server to allocate unbounded memory. This memory exhaustion results in partial post content loss and service disruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.011.6.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Teamplus Team+ Pro versionAccess the application admin panel or check the software release information. On the server, locate the version manifest or About page within Teamplus Team+ Pro. The version number is typically displayed in the product header, help menu, or system information page.Affected if The installed version is 3.011.6.0.1 or any earlier version (versions <= 3.011.6.0.1 are affected)
-
Verify community discussion module is activeLog into Teamplus Team+ Pro as an authenticated user and navigate to the community discussion or forum section. Check if you can access the thread creation interface where users submit new discussion threads.Affected if The community discussion feature is enabled and accessible to authenticated users, making the vulnerable thread subject input available
-
Inspect thread subject input field limitsCreate a new discussion thread or view the thread creation form. Examine the subject input field for any client-side or server-side length restrictions, such as maxlength attributes or validation messages.Affected if No visible length limit is enforced on the thread subject field, or the limit allows excessively large inputs (beyond typical reasonable lengths)
-
Review server memory configurationCheck the Teamplus application server configuration files or web server logs for memory allocation settings, request size limits, or resource throttling configurations related to form submissions.Affected if Memory or request size limits are absent or set too high, allowing unbounded input that could exhaust server resources
A user is affected if they run Teamplus Team+ Pro version 3.011.6.0.1 or earlier AND have the community discussion feature enabled with no length restrictions on thread subject submissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement server-side input validation with strict length limits on the thread subject field and add resource throttling to prevent memory exhaustion from large inputs.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-35221 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-35221 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data