CVE-2024-9922
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Team+ from TEAMPLUS TECHNOLOGY does not properly validate a specific page parameter, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to exploit this vulnerability to read arbitrary system files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceTeam+ from TEAMPLUS TECHNOLOGY contains a path traversal vulnerability due to improper validation of a page parameter. Unauthenticated remote attackers can exploit this to read arbitrary system files on the underlying server, potentially exposing sensitive configuration files, credentials, or other confidential data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 13.5.0, < 14.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Team+ Pro installationLocate the Team+ Pro application on the system: check for installation directories, running services, or the web application files. Look for process names or service entries related to Teamplus.Affected if Team+ Pro is not found on the system, the vulnerability does not apply.
-
Identify installed versionDetermine the exact version of Team+ Pro installed. Check the application's About page, version info in the installation directory, configuration files, or the Windows registry if on a Windows server.Affected if The installed version falls within >= 13.5.0 and < 14.0.0, the system may be vulnerable.
-
Verify web interface exposureConfirm that the Team+ Pro web interface is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS. Check if the application exposes endpoints that accept the 'page' parameter.Affected if The web interface is not exposed or the page parameter is not accessible, exploitation is not possible.
-
Check network accessibilityDetermine if the web server ports (typically 80, 443, or custom ports) are open and reachable from external or untrusted networks.Affected if The application is only accessible from trusted internal networks, the risk of unauthenticated remote exploitation is reduced.
A system is affected by CVE-2024-9922 if Team+ Pro version 13.5.0 or higher but below 14.0.0 is installed and its web interface with the vulnerable 'page' parameter is accessible to attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped14.0.0
Implement strict input validation and sanitization on the page parameter, using allowlisting of permitted values and canonicalizing file paths before access. Restrict file access to intended application directories only.
Team+ Pro 14.0.0 or later
- Identify all deployed instances of Team+ Pro version 13.5.0 or later but below 14.0.0
- Review the Team+ Pro 14.0.0 release notes and test plan for compatibility with your environment
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- Back up current configuration and data per Team+ documentation
- Upgrade Team+ Pro to version 14.0.0 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful and the service is operational
- Confirm the path traversal vulnerability is no longer present by testing the specific page parameter that was vulnerable
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-9922 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-9922 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data