CVE-2023-1072
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered in GitLab affecting all versions starting from 9.0 before 15.7.8, all versions starting from 15.8 before 15.8.4, all versions starting from 15.9 before 15.9.2. It was possible to trigger a resource depletion attack due to improper filtering for number of requests to read commits details.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGitLab versions 9.0 through 15.9.1 contain an improper input validation vulnerability in the commit details reading functionality. An attacker can trigger a resource depletion (denial of service) attack by sending excessive requests to read commit information without proper rate limiting or filtering on the number of requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.0, < 15.7.8>= 15.8, < 15.8.4>= 15.9, < 15.9.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed GitLab versionRun `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:version` or check the GitLab admin dashboard under Admin Area > Settings > General > GitLab versionAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: >= 9.0 and < 15.7.8, OR >= 15.8 and < 15.8.4, OR >= 15.9 and < 15.9.2
-
Verify commit API endpoints are accessibleAttempt to access a commit detail endpoint such as `/api/v4/projects/:id/repository/commits/:sha` using curl or a browser. If the endpoint responds with commit details, it is exposed.Affected if The commit reading API endpoint is accessible without additional authentication beyond standard GitLab authentication
-
Check for rate limiting on commit endpointsReview GitLab configuration file `/etc/gitlab/gitlab.rb` for `nginx['rate_limit']` settings or check if a web application firewall (WAF) or reverse proxy applies rate limiting to `/repository/commits` paths.Affected if No rate limiting is configured for commit-related API endpoints or the rate limiting threshold is not set low enough to prevent resource depletion
-
Review GitLab probe or health endpoint exposureSend multiple rapid requests to commit reading endpoints and observe response times and server resource usage. Use `for i in {1..100}; do curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}\n" "https://your-gitlab/api/v4/projects/1/repository/commits/master"; done` to test.Affected if The server shows degraded performance, timeouts, or returns 500 errors under rapid commit request load
You are affected if your GitLab version is between 9.0 and 15.9.1 (specifically < 15.7.8, < 15.8.4, or < 15.9.2 depending on your minor version) AND the commit reading API endpoints are accessible without sufficient rate limiting configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.7.815.8.415.9.2
Upgrade GitLab to version 15.7.8, 15.8.4, 15.9.2 or later. Alternatively, implement rate limiting at the web application firewall or reverse proxy level for commit-related API endpoints as a compensating control.
15.9.2 or later (or 15.7.8/15.8.4 depending on your branch)
- 1. Identify your current GitLab version by checking the GitLab admin area or running `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info`
- 2. If running version 15.7.x, upgrade to 15.7.8; if running 15.8.x, upgrade to 15.8.4; if running 15.9.x or 15.10.x, upgrade to at least 15.9.2 (preferably the latest stable release such as 15.11.x or newer)
- 3. Follow the standard GitLab upgrade procedure for your installation method (omnibus, source, or Docker)
- 4. After upgrade, verify GitLab is functioning correctly and the vulnerability is resolved
- 5. Review GitLab release notes for any additional security fixes included in the target version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-1072 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-1072 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data