CVE-2023-1965
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions starting from 14.2 before 15.9.6, all versions starting from 15.10 before 15.10.5, all versions starting from 15.11 before 15.11.1. Lack of verification on RelayState parameter allowed a maliciously crafted URL to obtain access tokens granted for 3rd party Group SAML SSO logins. This feature isn't enabled by default.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGitLab EE fails to validate the RelayState parameter in SAML Group SSO login flows. An attacker can craft a malicious URL that manipulates or captures access tokens during the SAML authentication process for group memberships.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 14.2, < 15.9.6>= 15.10, < 15.10.5>= 15.11, < 15.11.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed GitLab versionRun `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or check /opt/gitlab/version to get the exact version number installed in your environmentAffected if The version falls within >= 14.2, < 15.9.6 OR >= 15.10, < 15.10.5 OR >= 15.11, < 15.11.1
-
Verify SAML Group SSO is configuredNavigate to Admin Area > Settings > SAML SSO or check Group > Settings > SAML SSO to see if any SAML identity provider is linked for group accessAffected if SAML Group SSO is enabled and configured for any top-level group or subgroup
-
Inspect SAML settings for RelayState handlingReview the GitLab SAML configuration file at /etc/gitlab/gitlab.rb for `gitlab_rails['gitlab_saml_enabled']` setting or check via API: GET /groups/:id/saml_identitiesAffected if SAML SSO is enabled and the RelayState parameter can be controlled in authentication requests
-
Review authentication logs for anomalous SAML flowsCheck GitLab production logs for entries containing 'SAML' and 'RelayState' around authentication events: `sudo gitlab-ctl tail production.log | grep -i saml`Affected if Unusual RelayState values appear in logs or authentication requests originate from unexpected sources
You are affected if your GitLab version is in the vulnerable range AND SAML Group SSO is currently enabled and configured for group authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.9.615.10.515.11.1
Upgrade GitLab to version 15.9.6, 15.10.5, 15.11.1 or later. Verify if Group SAML SSO is enabled and audit for suspicious authentication activity.
Upgrade to GitLab 15.9.6, 15.10.5, or 15.11.1 (or later stable release)
- Back up your GitLab instance data and configuration before proceeding with the upgrade
- Plan your upgrade path based on your current version - if on 14.2-14.x, upgrade to 15.9.6 first then to latest; if on 15.10.x, upgrade to 15.10.5 or later; if on 15.11.x, upgrade to 15.11.1 or later
- Review GitLab upgrade documentation for your installation method (omnibus, source, etc.)
- Stop GitLab services before upgrade
- Perform the upgrade to the appropriate fixed version (minimum 15.9.6, 15.10.5, or 15.11.1 depending on your starting branch)
- After upgrade, verify that Group SAML SSO functionality works correctly
- If Group SAML SSO is in use, verify that the RelayState parameter is now properly validated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-1965 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-1965 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data