CVE-2023-3171
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in EAP-7 during deserialization of certain classes, which permits instantiation of HashMap and HashTable with no checks on resources consumed. This issue could allow an attacker to submit malicious requests using these classes, which could eventually exhaust the heap and result in a Denial of Service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA deserialization flaw in EAP-7 allows instantiation of HashMap and HashTable classes without resource consumption checks. Attackers can submit malicious requests using these classes, causing excessive memory allocation that exhausts the heap and results in Denial of Service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.4all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify JBoss EAP installation and versionRun 'rpm -qa | grep jboss' or check the product version file in the EAP installation directory (typically $JBOSS_HOME/bin/product.conf or similar)Affected if The installed version is Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 (any subversion)
-
Determine if deserialization endpoints are exposedCheck JBoss configuration files (standalone.xml or domain.xml) for remoting, JMX remoting, or HTTP invoker endpoints that accept serialized Java objects from external sourcesAffected if Deserialization services like JMX-over-RMI, HTTPInvoker, or JBoss Remoting are exposed to untrusted network segments or the internet
-
Inspect deserialization filter configurationSearch for 'javax.management.j2ee.deserialization' or 'allowed-classes' filter configurations in the JBoss configuration and security subsystem settingsAffected if No deserialization allowlist filters are configured, or HashMap and HashTable are not explicitly blocked from deserialization
-
Check for resource limits on deserializationLook for JVM heap memory limits (-Xmx) in the startup scripts and any deserialization timeout or depth limits in the security configurationAffected if No resource consumption limits are enforced on deserialization operations, or heap size is not configured to mitigate memory exhaustion
-
Verify network accessibility of deserialization servicesReview firewall rules and network bindings to determine if JBoss remoting ports (typically 4447, 8080, or custom ports) are accessible from untrusted networksAffected if Deserialization-capable services are reachable from external/untrusted network sources without authentication or additional filtering
You are affected if JBoss EAP 7.4 is running with deserialization endpoints exposed to untrusted sources and no allowlist filters blocking HashMap/HashTable deserialization are configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement deserialization allowlist filters to restrict which classes can be deserialized, particularly blocking HashMap and HashTable from untrusted sources, and configure resource limits on deserialization operations.
JBoss EAP 7.4.x latest Update (containing CVE-2023-3171 fix)
- 1. Identify the current JBoss EAP 7.4.x version in use (check jboss-eap-7.4 / standalone.xml for version)
- 2. Navigate to access.redhat.com and locate the security advisory for CVE-2023-3171
- 3. Download and apply the latest JBoss EAP 7.4.x update (e.g., 7.4.x Update N where the fix is included)
- 4. Ensure the new package is applied by replacing the jboss-eap-7.4 directory or using the applicable patch mechanism
- 5. Restart JBoss EAP services to load the updated libraries
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3171 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3171 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data