CVE-2023-3907
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA privilege escalation vulnerability in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 16.0 prior to 16.4.4, 16.5 prior to 16.5.4, and 16.6 prior to 16.6.2 allows a project Maintainer to use a Project Access Token to escalate their role to Owner
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGitLab EE has a privilege escalation vulnerability where a project Maintainer can exploit a Project Access Token to elevate their role to Owner. This is a broken access control issue in the project's access token authorization logic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 16.0.0, < 16.4.4>= 16.5, < 16.5.4>= 16.6, < 16.6.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify GitLab versionRun `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or check the GitLab admin panel under Help > Version. Compare the version number to the affected ranges: 16.0.0 to 16.4.3, 16.5.0 to 16.5.3, or 16.6.0 to 16.6.1.Affected if The installed version falls within any of the affected ranges (16.0.0-16.4.3, 16.5.0-16.5.3, or 16.6.0-16.6.1).
-
Verify Project Access Tokens are in useNavigate to a project's Settings > Access Tokens in the GitLab web UI, or query the GitLab API endpoint `/projects/:id/access_tokens` with appropriate admin credentials.Affected if Project Access Tokens exist in any project within the GitLab instance.
-
Identify users with Maintainer roleNavigate to Project > Settings > Members, or use the GitLab API `/projects/:id/members/all` to list all members and their roles.Affected if Any user holds the Maintainer role on projects that also have Project Access Tokens enabled.
-
Audit recent Project Access Token creationsReview project audit logs in Project > Settings > Audit Events, filtering for events of type 'access_token_created' or 'access_token_revoked'. Check if Maintainers created or used these tokens.Affected if Maintainer-role users have created or actively used Project Access Tokens in the affected version range.
You are affected if your GitLab version is 16.0.0-16.4.3, 16.5.0-16.5.3, or 16.6.0-16.6.1 AND you have Project Access Tokens in use with Maintainer-role users present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped16.4.416.5.416.6.2
Upgrade GitLab EE to versions 16.4.4, 16.5.4, 16.6.2 or later. Additionally, audit existing Project Access Tokens and maintainer-role assignments for suspicious activity.
GitLab 16.4.4, 16.5.4, or 16.6.2 (or latest stable version)
- 1. Back up your GitLab instance data before proceeding with the upgrade
- 2. Review the GitLab upgrade path documentation for your current version
- 3. For GitLab 16.0.x through 16.4.x: upgrade to GitLab 16.4.4 or later
- 4. For GitLab 16.5.x: upgrade to GitLab 16.5.4 or later
- 5. For GitLab 16.6.x: upgrade to GitLab 16.6.2 or later
- 6. Alternatively, upgrade directly to the latest stable GitLab release (16.6.3 or newer) which contains all security fixes
- 7. After upgrade, verify that project access tokens can only be created by Owner-level users as intended
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3907 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3907 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data