CVE-2023-3909
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 12.3 before 16.3.6, all versions starting from 16.4 before 16.4.2, all versions starting from 16.5 before 16.5.1. A Regular Expression Denial of Service was possible by adding a large string in timeout input in gitlab-ci.yml file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in GitLab CE/EE where parsing large strings in the timeout input field of .gitlab-ci.yml files can cause excessive CPU consumption due to inefficient regex processing, leading to service degradation or unavailability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 12.3.0, < 16.3.6>= 16.4.0, < 16.4.2= 16.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed GitLab versionRun `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or check the GitLab admin panel under Help > Version. Alternatively, check the /opt/gitlab/version file.Affected if The installed version is 12.3.0 or later but below 16.3.6, OR 16.4.0 or later but below 16.4.2, OR exactly 16.5.0.
-
Verify CI/CD pipeline functionality is enabledCheck if projects have access to CI/CD settings by navigating to a project Settings > CI/CD > General pipelines, or query the GitLab API: `curl -s "https://gitlab.example.com/api/v4/version"`.Affected if CI/CD pipelines are active and users can create or modify .gitlab-ci.yml files.
-
Confirm if untrusted users can modify CI/CD configurationsReview the group/project member roles and CI/CD settings. Check if external users, public project contributors, or users without maintainer privileges can push .gitlab-ci.yml files to repositories.Affected if Users with developer, maintainer, or push access to repositories can modify CI/CD configuration files.
-
Inspect .gitlab-ci.yml files for timeout field usageSearch repositories for .gitlab-ci.yml files containing the `timeout` keyword, especially where timeout values may contain unusually long strings. Use GitLab API or repository search: `grep -r "timeout:" */*.yml`.Affected if The instance hosts repositories with .gitlab-ci.yml files that contain timeout fields accessible to users who can trigger pipeline parsing.
You are affected if your GitLab version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND CI/CD pipelines are enabled with any user ability to modify .gitlab-ci.yml files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped16.3.616.4.2
Upgrade GitLab to version 16.3.6, 16.4.2, 16.5.1 or later. Alternatively, restrict who can modify CI/CD pipeline configurations and validate .gitlab-ci.yml files before acceptance.
16.5.1 (or 16.3.6 / 16.4.2 for respective version branches)
- Back up your GitLab instance database and repositories
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade (GitLab upgrades require downtime)
- For GitLab installations using package manager (Omnibus): Stop GitLab services with 'gitlab-ctl stop'
- Upgrade GitLab to version 16.3.6 (if currently on 12.3.0 through 16.3.x), version 16.4.2 (if currently on 16.4.0-16.4.1), or version 16.5.1 (if currently on 16.5.0)
- For package manager installations, run 'gitlab-ctl restart' after upgrade completes
- Verify GitLab is running and accessible
- Confirm the version upgrade was successful by checking Help > Version information
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,864.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3909 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3909 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data