Jboss Enterprise Application PlatformApplication · Redhat

CVE-2023-4503

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-02-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An improper initialization vulnerability was found in Galleon. When using Galleon to provision custom EAP or EAP-XP servers, the servers are created unsecured. This issue could allow an attacker to access remote HTTP services available from the server.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Galleon, a provisioning tool for JBoss EAP and EAP-XP servers, creates custom server instances without proper security initialization when provisioning. This results in unsecured servers with potentially exposed HTTP services that could be accessed remotely without authentication.

MitigationReview Galleon provisioning configurations to ensure security settings are explicitly applied during server creation, or implement post-provisioning security hardening steps for any EAP/EAP-XP servers provisioned with custom profiles.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Jboss Enterprise Application PlatformApplication
Affected:all versions= 7.4
Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Galleon-provisioned EAP instances
    Look for Galleon configuration files (usually named provisioning.xml or galleon.xml) in the server installation directory or check the server startup logs for Galleon provisioning messages.
    Affected if Galleon was used to create the server instance and no post-provisioning security hardening was applied.
  2. Verify security realm configuration
    Inspect the standalone.xml (or domain.xml) configuration file in the EAP instance configuration directory. Locate the <security-realm> sections and verify that authentication is properly configured for both management and application interfaces.
    Affected if Security realms are missing, disabled, or set to allow anonymous/bypass authentication.
  3. Check HTTP interface accessibility
    Attempt to access the management HTTP interface (typically port 9990) and application HTTP endpoints from an unauthorized host. Verify that authentication is required.
    Affected if HTTP management interface or application services respond without requiring authentication.
  4. Review management interface security settings
    In the standalone.xml, examine the <management> section. Check that <http-interface> has security-enabled="true" set and that <security-realm> references a properly configured security realm.
    Affected if Management HTTP interface has security disabled or no security realm is assigned.

You are affected if Galleon was used to provision JBoss EAP or EAP-XP servers and the resulting server instances have unsecured HTTP interfaces or missing security realm configurations that allow unauthenticated remote access.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Review Galleon provisioning configurations to ensure security settings are explicitly applied during server creation, or implement post-provisioning security hardening steps for any EAP/EAP-XP servers provisioned with custom profiles.

Fix this in Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-4503 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-4503 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data