CVE-2023-5009
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions starting from 13.12 before 16.2.7, all versions starting from 16.3 before 16.3.4. It was possible for an attacker to run pipeline jobs as an arbitrary user via scheduled security scan policies. This was a bypass of [CVE-2023-3932](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-3932) showing additional impact.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn authorization bypass vulnerability in GitLab EE allows attackers to execute pipeline jobs with arbitrary user privileges by exploiting scheduled security scan policies. This vulnerability bypasses the fix for CVE-2023-3932, enabling unauthorized pipeline execution as any user in the affected GitLab instance.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 13.12, < 16.2.7>= 16.3, < 16.3.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed GitLab EE versionRun `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or access the Admin Area in the GitLab web UI (Admin Area > Overview > Dashboard) to view the exact version number.Affected if Version is >= 13.12 and < 16.2.7, OR >= 16.3 and < 16.3.4
-
Check for scheduled security scan policiesNavigate to Project > Security > Configuration in the GitLab web UI, or query the API at `/api/v4/security/projects/:id/policies` to list any security scan policies with schedules defined.Affected if Any scheduled security scan policies exist in any project on the instance
-
Audit recent pipeline executions for unauthorized runsReview CI/CD pipeline logs via the web UI (CI/CD > Pipelines) or API at `/api/v4/projects/:id/pipelines` for any pipeline jobs executed with unexpected user context or unusual timing.Affected if Pipelines exist that were run by users who should not have had permission to trigger them, or pipelines executed outside normal schedules
A user is affected if their GitLab EE version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND scheduled security scan policies are configured on the instance.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped16.2.716.3.4
Upgrade GitLab EE to version 16.2.7 and later, or 16.3.4 and later to remediate this authorization bypass.
Upgrade to GitLab 16.2.7 or later (16.2.x branch), or 16.3.4 or later (16.3.x branch). Recommended: 16.3.4 or latest stable 16.x release.
- 1. Identify the currently installed GitLab version by running `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or checking the GitLab admin area.
- 2. If running a version >= 13.12 and < 16.2.7: plan upgrade to 16.2.7 or later in the 16.2.x branch.
- 3. If running a version >= 16.3 and < 16.3.4: plan upgrade to 16.3.4 or later in the 16.3.x branch.
- 4. If running an older version (prior to 13.12): upgrade to 16.3.4 or later (review GitLab's upgrade path for intermediate steps).
- 5. Before upgrading, backup the GitLab database and repositories following GitLab's backup documentation.
- 6. Perform the upgrade using the appropriate method (Omnibus, source, or Helm chart depending on installation type).
- 7. After upgrade, verify the version by running `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` to confirm the fix is applied.
- 8. Review pipeline security scan policies to ensure no unauthorized configurations were added during the vulnerability window.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-5009 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-5009 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data