GitLabApplication

CVE-2023-5226

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-12-01
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 16.4.3 / 16.5.3 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue has been discovered in GitLab affecting all versions before 16.4.3, all versions starting from 16.5 before 16.5.3, all versions starting from 16.6 before 16.6.1. Under certain circumstances, a malicious actor bypass prohibited branch checks using a specially crafted branch name to manipulate repository content in the UI.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

GitLab contains a vulnerability where specially crafted branch names can bypass prohibited branch checks, allowing a malicious actor to manipulate repository content through the UI by circumventing branch protection mechanisms.

MitigationUpgrade GitLab to version 16.4.3, 16.5.3, or 16.6.1 or later to patch the vulnerability. Review existing branch protections and monitor for any suspicious branch names in existing repositories.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
GitLabApplication
Affected:< 16.4.3>= 16.5.0, < 16.5.3= 16.6.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed GitLab version
    Access the GitLab Admin area Dashboard or use the API endpoint /api/v4/version to retrieve the current version number
    Affected if The installed version is less than 16.4.3, or between 16.5.0 and 16.5.3 inclusive, or exactly 16.6.0
  2. Confirm branch protection is configured
    Navigate to repository Settings > Repository > Protected branches to verify if any branches have protection rules defined
    Affected if Protected branches are defined in the repository settings
  3. Audit existing branch names for anomalies
    Review the branch list in the repository and check for branch names containing special characters, null bytes, or encoding variations that could bypass validation
    Affected if Any branches exist with unusual characters or encoding that may have circumvented prohibited branch name checks

Your environment is affected if GitLab version falls within the vulnerable range AND branch protection rules are in use, as specially crafted branch names could bypass those protections

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 16.4.3 / 16.5.3 or later
Fixed in 16.4.316.5.3
Interim mitigation

Upgrade GitLab to version 16.4.3, 16.5.3, or 16.6.1 or later to patch the vulnerability. Review existing branch protections and monitor for any suspicious branch names in existing repositories.

Recommended fix High confidence

GitLab 16.6.1 or later ( alternatively 16.5.3 or 16.4.3 )

  1. 1. Back up your GitLab instance data and configuration
  2. 2. Ensure you are currently running an affected version (< 16.4.3, >= 16.5.0 and < 16.5.3, or 16.6.0)
  3. 3. Plan maintenance window as upgrade may require downtime
  4. 4. For self-managed GitLab, stop the GitLab services before upgrade
  5. 5. Update to GitLab 16.6.1 or later (preferred) using your package manager or upgrade method
  6. 6. After upgrade, verify GitLab is functioning correctly
  7. 7. Confirm the version by checking Admin Area > Settings > General > GitLab version
Caveat Review GitLab upgrade guides for any required migration steps between your current and target version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in GitLab Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-5226 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-5226 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data