GitLabApplication

CVE-2023-6840

MEDIUM · 6.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-02-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 16.6.7 / 16.7.5 or later.
See remediation →
73/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue has been discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 16.4 prior to 16.6.7, 16.7 prior to 16.7.5, and 16.8 prior to 16.8.2 which allows a maintainer to change the name of a protected branch that bypasses the security policy added to block MR.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A maintainer-level user in GitLab EE can bypass security policies that block merge requests on protected branches by simply renaming the protected branch, effectively circumventing branch protection controls.

MitigationUpdate GitLab EE to versions 16.6.7, 16.7.5, 16.8.2 or later to patch this authorization bypass vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
GitLabApplication
Affected:>= 16.4.0, < 16.6.7>= 16.7.0, < 16.7.5>= 16.8.0, < 16.8.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed GitLab EE version
    Run command: gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info or check the GitLab admin panel at /admin/application_settings in the Version section
    Affected if Installed version falls within >= 16.4.0 AND < 16.6.7, OR >= 16.7.0 AND < 16.7.5, OR >= 16.8.0 AND < 16.8.2
  2. Verify presence of protected branches
    Navigate to repository settings at /<project>/-/settings/repository/branches and review the Protected branches list, or use API: GET /projects/:id/protected_branches
    Affected if Any protected branches exist in the project
  3. Check for security policies on protected branches
    Go to Security and Compliance > Protected branches in project settings, or navigate to /<project>/-/settings/branch_rules to see if any branch protection rules exist
    Affected if Branch protection rules or security policies are configured that should block merge requests to protected branches
  4. Identify users with Maintainer role
    Navigate to project Settings > Members, or use API: GET /projects/:id/members/all to list users with Maintainer role or higher
    Affected if Any user has Maintainer role or higher on the project who could potentially rename a protected branch

Environment is affected if GitLab EE version is within the vulnerable ranges AND protected branches with security policies exist AND a Maintainer-level user is present who could rename the protected branch to bypass those policies.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 16.6.7 / 16.7.5 / 16.8.2 or later
Fixed in 16.6.716.7.516.8.2
Interim mitigation

Update GitLab EE to versions 16.6.7, 16.7.5, 16.8.2 or later to patch this authorization bypass vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

16.6.7, 16.7.5, or 16.8.2 (or later)

  1. Review the GitLab upgrade documentation for your current version
  2. Plan your upgrade path following GitLab's recommended upgrade path
  3. Back up your GitLab instance data
  4. Stop the GitLab services
  5. Upgrade GitLab to version 16.6.7, 16.7.5, or 16.8.2 (or later)
  6. Verify the upgrade was successful
  7. Restart GitLab services
  8. Confirm the vulnerability is resolved by testing that maintainers can no longer bypass security policies when renaming protected branches
Caveat Standard GitLab upgrade considerations apply - review release notes for version-specific changes

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in GitLab Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-6840 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-6840 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data