CVE-2024-1736
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions prior to 16.10.7, starting from 16.11 prior to 16.11.4, and starting from 17.0 prior to 17.0.2. A vulnerability in GitLab's CI/CD pipeline editor could allow for denial of service attacks through maliciously crafted configuration files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA denial of service vulnerability exists in GitLab's CI/CD pipeline editor component. Attackers can exploit this by submitting maliciously crafted .gitlab-ci.yml configuration files that cause excessive resource consumption or processing failures, rendering the pipeline editor unavailable.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 16.10.7>= 16.11.0, < 16.11.4>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine your GitLab versionLog into GitLab as an administrator, go to Admin Area > Settings > About, or run `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` on the server to retrieve the installed version numberAffected if The displayed version falls within < 16.10.7, or >= 16.11.0 to < 16.11.4, or >= 17.0.0 to < 17.0.2
-
Verify CI/CD pipeline editor is accessibleNavigate to any project and check if the CI/CD Pipeline Editor (accessible via Project > Build > Pipeline editor) is available and functionalAffected if The pipeline editor interface loads and is usable, indicating the component is enabled
-
Confirm user access to CI/CD configurationNavigate to Project > Repository > Files and locate .gitlab-ci.yml, or go to CI/CD Settings > Pipeline editor to see who can modify pipeline configurationsAffected if Untrusted or unauthenticated users have the ability to create or modify .gitlab-ci.yml files in any project
-
Check for pipeline processing issuesReview recent pipeline jobs in Project > Build > Pipelines for signs of excessive resource consumption, timeouts, or failed processingAffected if Pipelines are failing with resource-related errors or taking unusually long to process simple configurations
Your environment is affected if the GitLab version is lower than 16.10.7, between 16.11.0-16.11.3, or between 17.0.0-17.0.1 AND untrusted users can access the CI/CD pipeline editor to submit .gitlab-ci.yml files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped16.10.716.11.417.0.2
Upgrade GitLab to version 16.10.7, 16.11.4, or 17.0.2 or later to patch this vulnerability. Until patched, restrict CI/CD configuration file access to trusted users only.
Upgrade to GitLab 17.0.2 (or minimum 16.10.7/16.11.4 depending on your current version branch)
- 1. Back up your GitLab instance data and configuration before proceeding with the upgrade
- 2. Review GitLab's upgrade path documentation to ensure compatibility with your current version
- 3. Plan maintenance window as upgrade will require service interruption
- 4. Upgrade GitLab to version 17.0.2 (or at minimum 16.10.7 or 16.11.4 depending on your branch)
- 5. After upgrade, verify the CI/CD pipeline editor functionality is working correctly
- 6. Test that legitimate .gitlab-ci.yml files parse correctly
- 7. Monitor system performance to confirm DoS vulnerability is mitigated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-1736 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-1736 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data