CVE-2024-2651
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions before 16.9.7, all versions starting from 16.10 before 16.10.5, all versions starting from 16.11 before 16.11.2. It was possible for an attacker to cause a denial of service using maliciously crafted markdown content.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA denial of service vulnerability exists in GitLab CE/EE where maliciously crafted markdown content can be used to cause excessive resource consumption during rendering. The vulnerability affects all versions before 16.9.7, 16.10 through 16.10.4, and 16.11 through 16.11.1.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 16.9.7>= 16.10.0, < 16.10.5>= 16.11.0, < 16.11.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed GitLab versionLog into the GitLab admin area and navigate to the Help page or use the command 'sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info' in the server terminal. The version is displayed as 'GitLab (version X.Y.Z)'.Affected if The displayed version is below 16.9.7, between 16.10.0 and 16.10.4 inclusive, or between 16.11.0 and 16.11.1 inclusive.
-
Verify GitLab component is exposedConfirm that the GitLab instance has markdown rendering enabled. This is typically enabled by default for issues, merge requests, comments, and README files. No additional configuration check is needed as this is a default feature.Affected if Markdown rendering is available on the GitLab instance, which is the default state.
-
Confirm markdown content can be submittedVerify that users can submit or create markdown content through issues, merge requests, comments, or wiki pages. Try creating a test issue or comment with any markdown content.Affected if Users have the ability to submit or create markdown content in any GitLab project or repository.
If the installed GitLab version falls within the affected ranges (before 16.9.7, 16.10.0-16.10.4, or 16.11.0-16.11.1) and the instance accepts markdown input from users, the environment is vulnerable to the denial of service via maliciously crafted markdown.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped16.9.716.10.516.11.2
Upgrade GitLab to version 16.9.7, 16.10.5, 16.11.2 or later. As a temporary workaround, restrict or sanitize markdown content from untrusted sources.
Upgrade to GitLab 16.9.7, 16.10.5, or 16.11.2 (or later) depending on your current version branch
- 1. Back up your GitLab instance data before proceeding with the upgrade
- 2. Identify your current GitLab version by navigating to the GitLab admin area or running `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info`
- 3. Plan your upgrade path based on your current version: if below 16.9.7, upgrade to 16.9.7 or later; if 16.10.x, upgrade to 16.10.5 or later; if 16.11.0-16.11.1, upgrade to 16.11.2 or later
- 4. For self-managed GitLab, follow the official upgrade documentation for your installation method (Omnibus, source, or Helm chart)
- 5. For GitLab SaaS (gitlab.com), no action required as the vendor handles updates
- 6. After upgrade, verify the GitLab instance is operational and test markdown rendering
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-2651 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-2651 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data