CVE-2024-27364
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Mobile Processor, Wearable Processor Exynos 980, Exynos 850, Exynos 1080, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, Exynos 1330, Exynos 1480, Exynos W920, Exynos W930. In the function slsi_rx_roamed_ind(), there is no input validation check on a length coming from userspace, which can lead to a potential heap over-read.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability exists in Samsung Exynos mobile and wearable processors (models 980, 850, 1080, 1280, 1380, 1330, 1480, W920, W930). The function slsi_rx_roamed_ind() in the kernel driver lacks input validation on a length parameter received from userspace, allowing a malicious userspace application to trigger a heap over-read beyond allocated buffer boundaries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Exynos processor modelCheck /proc/cpuinfo, /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/model, or use 'lscpu' command to identify the processor. Alternatively, check 'cat /proc/device-tree/model' or 'getprop ro.hardware' on Android devices.Affected if The identified model matches any of: Exynos 980, 850, 1080, 1280, 1380, 1330, 1480, W920, or W930. All versions of these models are affected.
-
Verify the slsi kernel driver is presentCheck for the presence of the Samsung LSI WiFi driver module. Look for files containing 'slsi' in /sys/module/, /proc/modules, or check kernel config CONFIG_SLSI_SAMSUNG_WLAN or similar. The vulnerable function slsi_rx_roamed_ind() exists in drivers/staging/slsi/ or similar paths in Samsung kernel trees.Affected if The slsi driver module is loaded or compiled into the kernel, indicating the vulnerable code path is present on the device.
-
Confirm wireless/WiFi functionality is enabledCheck if the WiFi interface (typically wlan0) is present via 'ip link show' or 'ifconfig -a'. Also check rfkill status: 'rfkill list all' or check /sys/class/rfkill/ for unblocked wireless adapters.Affected if WiFi or wireless connectivity is enabled and the device can communicate with userspace applications, providing the attack surface for the vulnerable function.
-
Check for userspace access to WiFi driver ioctl or netlinkVerify that userspace processes can invoke driver functions. Check permissions on /dev/wlan or similar device nodes: 'ls -la /dev/wlan*' or check WiFi socket permissions. The vulnerability requires a malicious userspace app to send crafted input to the driver.Affected if The WiFi driver accepts direct ioctl or netlink commands from userspace with insufficient validation, which is the normal operational mode for these drivers.
If the device contains any of the affected Exynos models (980, 850, 1080, 1280, 1380, 1330, 1480, W920, W930) and runs the Samsung kernel driver with WiFi functionality enabled, the device is vulnerable to heap over-read via the slsi_rx_roamed_ind() function.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedThe fix requires adding proper bounds checking on the userspace length parameter before using it to read data into heap buffers, ensuring the length does not exceed the destination buffer size. This is a kernel driver patch requiring Samsung's proprietary kernel source updates.
- Contact Samsung Semiconductor support (semiconductor.samsung.com) to request the firmware security update for your specific Exynos model
- Provide the CVE-2024-27364 vulnerability details to your Samsung representative or device vendor
- Request the patched firmware version that addresses the missing input validation in slsi_rx_roamed_ind() function
- Apply the vendor-provided firmware update through the appropriate update mechanism for your device (OTA or manual flashing)
- Verify the update was successfully applied and the vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,472.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-27364 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-27364 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data