CVE-2024-27377
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor Exynos 980, Exynos 850, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, and Exynos 1330. In the function slsi_nan_get_security_info_nl(), there is no input validation check on sec_info->key_info.body.pmk_info.pmk_len coming from userspace, which can lead to a heap overwrite.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn the slsi_nan_get_security_info_nl() function used by Samsung's NAN (Neighbor Awareness Networking) service, the pmk_len field from userspace is used without validation to determine memory copy sizes, allowing a malicious userspace application to overwrite heap memory by providing an oversized pmk_len value.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Exynos chipset modelCheck the device or system's processor/model information. For Samsung devices, this can be found in /proc/cpuinfo, system settings, or device specifications. Look for model numbers: Exynos 980, 850, 1280, 1380, or 1330.Affected if The device uses any of the following chipsets: Exynos 980, 850, 1280, 1380, or 1330 - all versions of these are affected.
-
Determine the firmware versionAccess the firmware version of the Exynos chipset. On Samsung devices, this is typically found in Settings > About Phone > Software Information, or via diagnostic tools. Check for any available firmware version strings or build numbers.Affected if The firmware version is older than any Samsung security update that addresses CVE-2024-27377. Since all versions are listed as affected, any unpatched firmware version is vulnerable.
-
Check if NAN (Neighbor Awareness Networking) service is activeInspect running services or network configurations to determine if the NAN feature is enabled. On Android devices, check for 'NAN' or 'Wi-Fi Aware' in settings or via diagnostic commands (e.g., 'dumpsys wifi' or 'settings list global' for wifi_aware_enabled).Affected if The NAN/Wi-Fi Aware feature is enabled on the device. The vulnerability exists in the slsi_nan_get_security_info_nl() function which processes NAN security information.
-
Verify the slsi_nan driver or service presenceCheck for the presence of the slsi_nan kernel module or service. On Android/Linux systems, look for slsi_nan in /proc/modules, lsmod output, or check for related processes/services handling NAN protocol.Affected if The slsi_nan driver/service is present and running. This is the component containing the vulnerable function slsi_nan_get_security_info_nl().
A device is affected if it uses an Exynos 980, 850, 1280, 1380, or 1330 chipset with NAN/Wi-Fi Aware enabled and has not received the Samsung security patch for CVE-2024-27377.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Samsung firmware/security updates for affected Exynos processors (980, 850, 1280, 1380, 1330) once released. Samsung must add bounds validation on pmk_len before using it in memory operations.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-27377 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-27377 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data