CVE-2024-3976
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 14.0 prior to 16.9.7, starting from 16.10 prior to 16.10.5, and starting from 16.11 prior to 16.11.2. It was possible to disclose via the UI the confidential issues title and description from a public project to unauthorised instance users.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA UI-based information disclosure vulnerability in GitLab allows unauthorized instance users to view confidential issue titles and descriptions from public projects via the web interface. The flaw exists in how the UI handled access control for confidential issues in public projects.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 14.0.0, < 16.9.7>= 16.10.0, < 16.10.5>= 16.11.0, < 16.11.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine GitLab versionNavigate to the GitLab administration area or run `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` to retrieve the installed GitLab versionAffected if The installed version falls within any of the affected ranges: >=14.0.0 and <16.9.7, OR >=16.10.0 and <16.10.5, OR >=16.11.0 and <16.11.2
-
Identify public projects with confidential issuesUse the GitLab API or web interface to list public projects, then check for issues marked as confidential. You can query: `GET /issues?state=opened&confidential=true` via API with appropriate credentialsAffected if Public projects exist that contain confidential issues, creating the conditions for potential exploitation
-
Verify user access configurationCheck if non-member or external users have access to the GitLab instance. Review the instance-level access settings and public project visibility settings in the administration panelAffected if The instance allows user registration or has non-admin users who are not members of the affected public projects
-
Test issue visibility via web interfaceAs a low-privilege or unauthorized user (such as a guest or external user), attempt to access a confidential issue in a public project through the web UI by navigating directly to the issue URLAffected if A user without proper authorization can view the title and description of a confidential issue in a public project through the web interface
You are affected if your GitLab version is within the vulnerable ranges AND you have public projects containing confidential issues accessible to unauthorized instance users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped16.9.716.10.516.11.2
Upgrade GitLab to version 16.9.7, 16.10.5, 16.11.2 or later to patch the vulnerability.
16.9.7, 16.10.5, or 16.11.2 (recommended: 16.11.2 or latest stable)
- 1. Back up your GitLab instance data before proceeding with the upgrade
- 2. Review GitLab upgrade documentation for your deployment method (Omnibus, source, or Docker)
- 3. Plan for appropriate maintenance window as upgrade may require downtime
- 4. Upgrade to one of the fixed versions: 16.9.7, 16.10.5, or 16.11.2
- 5. For Omnibus installations: sudo gitlab-ctl restart
- 6. For source installations: restart the GitLab service
- 7. Verify the upgrade completed successfully and GitLab is functioning normally
- 8. Test that confidential issues in public projects are no longer visible to unauthorized users
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,848.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-3976 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-3976 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data