CVE-2024-55925
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Xerox Workplace Suite, an API restricted to specific hosts can be bypassed by manipulating the Host header. If the server improperly validates or trusts the Host header without verifying the actual destination, an attacker can forge a value to gain unauthorized access. This exploit targets improper host validation, potentially exposing sensitive API endpoints.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceXerox Workplace Suite contains an API endpoint restricted to specific hosts that can be bypassed through HTTP Host header manipulation. The server improperly validates or trusts the Host header without verifying the actual destination, allowing attackers to forge the header value and gain unauthorized access to sensitive API endpoints.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.6.701.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Xerox Workplace Suite installation and versionLocate the Xerox Workplace Suite installation directory or check the installed software version via the system control panel, administrative console, or vendor-provided version query tool.Affected if The installed version is lower than 5.6.701.9
-
Verify API endpoint exposureCheck the server configuration files or web interface for exposed API endpoints. Look for REST API, web service, or administrative API configurations in the Xerox Workplace Suite settings or configuration XML/files.Affected if API endpoints are accessible without proper network restrictions or authentication barriers
-
Test Host header validation weaknessSend a crafted HTTP request to the API endpoint with a manipulated Host header (e.g., an arbitrary domain or internal IP) and observe whether the request is accepted or processed as if from an allowed source.Affected if The server accepts and processes requests with arbitrary Host header values without rejecting or validating them against an allowlist
-
Review Host header access control logsExamine server access logs, audit logs, or security event logs for suspicious API access patterns, particularly requests with unusual or unexpected Host header values originating from untrusted sources.Affected if Logs show API access with manipulated Host headers or requests from unexpected host values that were not blocked
The environment is affected if Xerox Workplace Suite version is below 5.6.701.9 and the API endpoint is accessible with manipulated Host headers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.6.701.9
Implement strict Host header validation against an allowlist of permitted values and verify the request actually targets the expected server. Additionally, enforce robust authentication and authorization checks independent of Host header validation.
5.6.701.9 or later
- Identify the currently installed Xerox Workplace Suite version through the admin console or system information
- Confirm the current version is below 5.6.701.9
- Review the upgrade release notes on securitydocs.business.xerox.com for any specific upgrade requirements
- Create a full backup of the current Workplace Suite configuration
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- Download the latest Workplace Suite version (5.6.701.9 or later) from the official Xerox support portal
- Execute the upgrade following the documented installation procedure
- After upgrade, verify the Host header validation is properly enforced by testing API access with manipulated Host headers
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-55925 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-55925 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data