Workplace SuiteApplication · Xerox

CVE-2024-55931

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.6.701.9 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Xerox Workplace Suite stores tokens in session storage, which may expose them to potential access if a user's session is compromised.  The patch for this vulnerability will be included in a future release of Workplace Suite, and customers will be notified through an update to the security bulletin.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Xerox Workplace Suite stores authentication tokens in browser session storage, which is accessible via JavaScript. This exposes tokens to potential theft through cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks or if an attacker compromises the user's session, allowing unauthorized access.

MitigationUntil the patch is released, implement compensating controls such as Content Security Policy (CSP) headers, robust XSS filtering, and session anomaly monitoring. Consider using httpOnly, secure cookies or server-side session management as a long-term mitigation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Workplace SuiteApplication
Affected:< 5.6.701.9

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Xerox Workplace Suite version
    Access the Xerox Workplace Suite admin console or check the application version in the About/Version section of the web interface. Alternatively, check the software installation package or system inventory for the exact version number installed.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 5.6.701.9 (e.g., 5.6.x, 5.5.x, etc.)
  2. Inspect browser storage for authentication tokens
    Open the Xerox Workplace Suite web application in a browser, log in, then open browser developer tools (F12). Navigate to the Application tab and examine Session Storage and Local Storage under Storage. Look for keys containing 'token', 'auth', 'session', or 'jwt' that store authentication credentials.
    Affected if Authentication tokens or session identifiers are present in sessionStorage or localStorage (accessible via window.sessionStorage or window.localStorage)
  3. Verify cookie storage settings
    In browser developer tools, go to the Application tab and expand Cookies for the application domain. Check if authentication cookies have the HttpOnly and Secure flags set.
    Affected if Authentication cookies are missing the HttpOnly flag, allowing JavaScript access via document.cookie

You are affected if your installed Xerox Workplace Suite version is below 5.6.701.9 AND your application stores authentication tokens in browser session/local storage that is accessible to JavaScript, rather than using httpOnly cookies.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.6.701.9 or later
Fixed in 5.6.701.9
Interim mitigation

Until the patch is released, implement compensating controls such as Content Security Policy (CSP) headers, robust XSS filtering, and session anomaly monitoring. Consider using httpOnly, secure cookies or server-side session management as a long-term mitigation.

Fix this in Workplace Suite Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-55931 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-55931 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data