CVE-2024-8186
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 16.6 before 17.7.6, 17.8 before 17.8.4, and 17.9 before 17.9.1. An attacker could inject HMTL into the child item search potentially leading to XSS in certain situations.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in GitLab CE/EE allows attackers to inject malicious HTML/JavaScript into the child item search field. When victims view the search results containing the injected content, the malicious script executes in their browser context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 16.6.0, < 17.7.6>= 17.8.0, < 17.8.4= 17.9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed GitLab versionNavigate to the GitLab Admin area (Admin > Overview > Dashboard) or run `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` to display version information. The version is also visible in the page footer of the GitLab UI.Affected if The installed version falls within 16.6.0 to 17.7.5, 17.8.0 to 17.8.3, or equals 17.9.0.
-
Verify child item search feature is accessibleThe vulnerability exists in the child item search field, typically found in project issue or epic hierarchies. Check if users with reporter or higher roles can access issue/epic boards and use the search functionality that displays child items.Affected if The child item search interface is available to authenticated users in the GitLab instance.
-
Review audit logs for suspicious search inputExamine GitLab audit logs (Admin > Analytics > Audit Events) for entries containing HTML, script tags, or JavaScript event handlers in search field parameters. Filter for event type related to search or list actions.Affected if Audit logs show encoded or raw HTML/script content in search queries, indicating potential exploitation attempts.
-
Inspect browser console for XSS indicatorsIf you have access to a test account, use the child item search functionality and check the browser developer console (F12) for any script errors or injected script execution when viewing search results.Affected if Malicious scripts execute or console shows XSS warnings when viewing search results containing injected content.
A GitLab instance is affected if it runs a version in the vulnerable ranges AND the child item search feature is enabled and accessible to users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped17.7.617.8.4
Upgrade GitLab to version 17.7.6, 17.8.4, 17.9.1 or later. Until upgraded, restrict access to the child item search functionality or implement WAF rules to filter malicious input.
GitLab 17.7.6, 17.8.4, or 17.9.1 (or later) depending on starting version
- 1. Identify the currently installed GitLab version using `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or the GitLab admin interface
- 2. Based on your current version, plan the upgrade path to the fixed release
- 3. For GitLab 16.6.x through 17.7.x: Upgrade to GitLab 17.7.6 or later
- 4. For GitLab 17.8.x: Upgrade to GitLab 17.8.4 or later
- 5. For GitLab 17.9.0: Upgrade to GitLab 17.9.1 or later
- 6. Follow the official GitLab upgrade documentation for your deployment method (omnibus, source, etc.)
- 7. After upgrade, verify the version with `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info`
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-8186 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-8186 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data