CVE-2024-9512
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions prior to 17.10.8, 17.11 prior to 17.11.4, and 18.0 prior to 18.0.2. It may have been possible for private repository to be cloned in case of race condition when a secondary node is out of sync.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition in GitLab EE allows private repositories to be cloned when a secondary node is out of sync with the primary. During the synchronization window, an attacker could potentially access private repositories before the access controls are properly enforced across nodes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 17.10.8>= 17.11.0, < 17.11.4>= 18.0.0, < 18.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm GitLab edition is EE (Enterprise Edition)Run `grep -E '^gitlab-ee' /opt/gitlab/version-manifest.txt` or check the license file at `/opt/gitlab/license.rb` for 'enterprise' indicators. Alternatively, check the admin area UI for the GitLab edition.Affected if Running GitLab CE (Community Edition) is not affected; only GitLab EE is vulnerable.
-
Determine installed GitLab versionRun `gitlab-rake gitlab:version` or check `/opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gitlab-rails/VERSION` file to obtain the exact installed version.Affected if Version falls in < 17.10.8, >= 17.11.0 and < 17.11.4, or >= 18.0.0 and < 18.0.2.
-
Verify multi-node HA deployment existsCheck for the presence of multiple GitLab nodes by reviewing the gitlab.rb configuration file at `/etc/gitlab/gitlab.rb` for `gitlab_rails['gitlab_shell_ssh_port']` entries across nodes, or query the database for multiple node records in the `geo_nodes` table if Geo is enabled, or check load balancer configurations.Affected if This vulnerability only affects environments with primary and secondary nodes; single-node installations are not impacted.
-
Check node synchronization statusOn secondary nodes, run `git Geo status` or query the database for replication lag in the `geo_event_log` table to identify if nodes are out of sync. Also check `gitlab-rake geo:status` for sync state.Affected if If secondary nodes show replication lag, delayed sync, or out-of-sync status during normal operation, the race condition window exists.
-
Review repository access logs for anomalous private repo clonesSearch Rails logs at `/var/log/gitlab/gitlab-rails/production_json.log` for `repository_cloned` events where the user accessing should not have permission, or check the `audit_events` table for unauthorized repository access patterns.Affected if Any private repository access attempts occurring during known synchronization windows or from nodes reporting out-of-sync status indicate potential exploitation.
A user is affected if running GitLab EE in a multi-node configuration with a version in the affected ranges, where secondary nodes can become temporarily out of sync with the primary, allowing unauthorized private repository access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped17.10.817.11.418.0.2
Upgrade GitLab EE to version 17.10.8, 17.11.4, 18.0.2 or later. Ensure proper node synchronization is maintained and monitor for any anomalous repository access during failover scenarios.
18.0.2 (or 17.11.4 if staying on 17.11, or 17.10.8 if staying on 17.10)
- Review the current GitLab version using `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info`
- Backup your GitLab instance including database and repositories
- For installations using OMU (Omnibus), run: `sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install gitlab-ee` (Debian/Ubuntu) or `sudo yum install gitlab-ee` (RHEL/CentOS)
- For installations using source, follow the upgrade documentation at https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/update/
- After upgrade, verify the new version with `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info`
- Test that private repository cloning works correctly in a HA/clustered setup
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-9512 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-9512 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data