CVE-2025-10871
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 16.6 before 18.2.7, 18.3 before 18.3.3, and 18.4 before 18.4.1. Project Maintainers can exploit a vulnerability where they can assign custom roles to users with permissions exceeding their own, effectively granting themselves elevated privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA privilege escalation vulnerability in GitLab EE allows Project Maintainers to assign custom roles to users with permissions exceeding their own role level, effectively granting themselves elevated privileges beyond what their current role permits.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 16.6.0, < 18.2.7>= 18.3.0, < 18.3.3= 18.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed GitLab versionRun 'gitlab-rake gitlab:version' or check the GitLab admin panel under Help > Version to obtain the exact version numberAffected if The installed version falls within the affected ranges: 16.6.0 to 18.2.6, 18.3.0 to 18.3.2, or 18.4.0 exactly
-
Confirm GitLab edition is Enterprise Edition (EE)Verify through the admin panel footer or by running 'gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info' which displays the GitLab editionAffected if The instance is running GitLab EE (Community Edition is not affected by this vulnerability)
-
Verify custom roles feature is in useCheck the GitLab admin panel under Settings > Roles (or equivalent custom roles management interface) to see if any custom roles have been defined and are assignableAffected if Custom roles feature is enabled and custom roles exist in the system
-
Review custom role assignments for privilege escalationQuery the database or use admin API endpoints to list all custom role assignments, then compare each assigned role's permissions against the assigner's role level to identify any assignments where a Project Maintainer assigned a role with permissions exceeding their own levelAffected if Any custom role assignments exist where the assignee received privileges higher than what a Project Maintainer should be able to grant
A user is affected if their GitLab EE installation version is within the affected ranges AND the custom roles feature is enabled and has been used for assignments that exceed the assigner's permission level.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.2.718.3.3
Upgrade GitLab to version 18.2.7, 18.3.3, or 18.4.1 or later. Review existing custom role assignments to detect any unauthorized privilege escalation that may have occurred prior to patching.
Upgrade to GitLab 18.2.7, 18.3.3, 18.4.1, or later (recommended: latest stable 18.x release)
- 1. Backup your GitLab instance and database before proceeding with the upgrade
- 2. Determine your current GitLab version by navigating to the GitLab admin area or running `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info`
- 3. Plan your upgrade path based on your current version - if on 16.6.x through 18.1.x, upgrade to 18.2.7 first before going to later versions
- 4. For installations using the official GitLab packages (Omnibus), run: `sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install gitlab-ce` (or gitlab-ee for Enterprise Edition)
- 5. For installations using Docker, pull the fixed image: `docker pull gitlab/gitlab-ee:18.4.1` or later
- 6. For source installations, follow the upgrade guide at https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/update/
- 7. After upgrade, verify the installation: `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:check`
- 8. Clear cache if needed: `sudo gitlab-rails cache:clear`
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10871 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10871 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data