CVE-2025-11037
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in code-projects E-Commerce Website 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /pages/admin_index_search.php. Performing manipulation of the argument Search results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA SQL injection vulnerability exists in the /pages/admin_index_search.php file of code-projects E-Commerce Website 1.0. The 'Search' parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL queries, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands. This can lead to unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or potential remote code execution depending on database configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm product and versionIdentify the installed version of Fabian E Commerce Website. Check for version identifiers in the application source code, README files, or admin panel. The affected version is 1.0.Affected if The installed version is Fabian E Commerce Website version 1.0
-
Locate vulnerable fileCheck if the file /pages/admin_index_search.php exists in the web application root directory or source code.Affected if The file /pages/admin_index_search.php is present in the installation
-
Verify Search functionality is accessibleCheck if the Search functionality linked to admin_index_search.php is accessible on the website. This typically appears in the admin panel or a search feature accessible to users.Affected if The Search functionality is enabled and accessible (regardless of authentication status)
-
Inspect Search parameter handlingExamine the source code of admin_index_search.php. Look for how the 'Search' parameter (usually via GET or POST request) is handled and whether it is used directly in SQL queries without prepared statements, parameterization, or sanitization.Affected if The code uses the Search parameter directly in SQL queries without prepared statements, binding, or input sanitization
The environment is affected if Fabian E Commerce Website version 1.0 is installed, the file /pages/admin_index_search.php exists, and the Search parameter is used in SQL queries without proper parameterization or sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement prepared statements/parameterized queries for all database operations involving user input. Alternatively, apply strict input validation and sanitization on the Search parameter. Additionally, apply the principle of least privilege to the database user account to limit the impact of successful injection.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11037 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11037 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data