CVE-2025-12029
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 15.11 before 18.4.6, 18.5 before 18.5.4, and 18.6 before 18.6.2 that could have, under certain circumstances, allowed an unauthenticated user to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of another user by injecting malicious external scripts into the Swagger UI."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in GitLab's Swagger UI that allows an unauthenticated attacker to inject malicious external scripts. When an authenticated user accesses the Swagger UI, these scripts execute in their session, enabling the attacker to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of that user (essentially a CSRF attack vector).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 15.11.0, < 18.4.6>= 18.5.0, < 18.5.4>= 18.6.0, < 18.6.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed GitLab versionLog into the GitLab admin dashboard and navigate to the version information page, or run 'gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info' on the server to display version detailsAffected if The version falls within any of these ranges: 15.11.0 to 18.4.5, 18.5.0 to 18.5.3, or 18.6.0 to 18.6.1
-
Verify Swagger UI is accessibleNavigate to the API documentation endpoint (typically /api/v4/-/swagger or /help/api/swagger) while authenticated as a regular userAffected if The Swagger UI page loads successfully and displays the API documentation interface
-
Confirm Swagger endpoint is reachable without authenticationAttempt to access the Swagger UI URL in an unauthenticated browser session or use a command-line tool like curl to request the endpointAffected if The endpoint returns a 200 response with Swagger UI content without requiring login credentials
-
Check if API endpoints accept requests without CSRF tokensReview the GitLab configuration file (gitlab.rb or gitlab.yml) for API-related settings and examine whether the API enforces CSRF protection for state-changing requestsAffected if The API is configured to allow requests from Swagger UI without requiring CSRF token validation
You are affected if your GitLab version is 15.11.0 through 18.4.5, 18.5.0 through 18.5.3, or 18.6.0 through 18.6.1 AND the Swagger UI is enabled and accessible to users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.4.618.5.418.6.2
Upgrade GitLab to versions 18.4.6, 18.5.4, 18.6.2 or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider disabling or restricting access to the Swagger UI until the upgrade can be completed.
18.4.6 (for 15.11-18.3.x) or 18.5.4 (for 18.5.x) or 18.6.2 (for 18.6.0-18.6.1)
- 1. Backup your GitLab instance before starting the upgrade process
- 2. Determine your current GitLab version from the GitLab administration panel or by running `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info`
- 3. If running version 15.11.x through 18.3.x: upgrade to GitLab 18.4.6
- 4. If running version 18.5.x: upgrade to GitLab 18.5.4
- 5. If running version 18.6.0 or 18.6.1: upgrade to GitLab 18.6.2
- 6. After upgrade, verify Swagger UI is functioning correctly and the XSS vulnerability is resolved
- 7. Test that authenticated and unauthenticated interactions work as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12029 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12029 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data