GitLabApplication

CVE-2025-1250

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 18.1.6 / 18.2.6 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 15.0 before 18.1.6, 18.2 before 18.2.6, and 18.3 before 18.3.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user to stall background job processing by sending specially crafted commit messages, merge request descriptions, or notes.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

An authenticated user can cause denial of service by submitting specially crafted commit messages, merge request descriptions, or notes that stall GitLab background job processing, affecting availability of automated workflows.

MitigationUpgrade GitLab to version 18.1.6, 18.2.6, 18.3.2 or later to patch the vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
GitLabApplication
Affected:>= 15.0.0, < 18.1.6>= 18.2.0, < 18.2.6>= 18.3.0, < 18.3.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm GitLab is installed
    Check for GitLab installation by looking for gitlab-rails command or checking /opt/gitlab directory: ls -la /opt/gitlab 2>/dev/null || which gitlab-rails
    Affected if GitLab is not installed on this system
  2. Determine installed GitLab version
    Run gitlab-rake gitlab:version or check /opt/gitlab/version-manifest.txt to obtain the exact version number
    Affected if Version cannot be determined or is outside the affected range
  3. Compare version against affected ranges
    Compare your installed version to: >= 15.0.0 AND < 18.1.6, OR >= 18.2.0 AND < 18.2.6, OR >= 18.3.0 AND < 18.3.2
    Affected if Your version falls within any of these ranges
  4. Verify GitLab service is running
    Check if GitLab is operational: gitlab-ctl status or systemctl status gitlab-runsvdir
    Affected if GitLab is actively running and processing requests
  5. Confirm authenticated user access is possible
    Review whether user authentication is enabled in GitLab settings. Check in Admin Area > Settings > General > Sign-up restrictions
    Affected if Authentication is enabled allowing user accounts to submit commit messages, merge requests, or notes

You are affected if GitLab is installed, running a version within 15.0.0 to 18.1.5, 18.2.0 to 18.2.5, or 18.3.0 to 18.3.1, and authenticated users can submit content to the system.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 18.1.6 / 18.2.6 / 18.3.2 or later
Fixed in 18.1.618.2.618.3.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade GitLab to version 18.1.6, 18.2.6, 18.3.2 or later to patch the vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

18.3.2 (or latest stable 18.x release)

  1. Backup the GitLab database and configuration before proceeding with any upgrade
  2. Update GitLab to the latest patched version (18.3.2 or later for the 18.3 branch, 18.2.6 for the 18.2 branch, or 18.1.6 for the 18.1 branch)
  3. Run 'sudo gitlab-ctl reconfigure' after the upgrade completes
  4. Verify background job processing is functioning normally by checking the GitLab admin area
Caveat Upgrading across major versions (e.g., 15.x to 18.x) may introduce breaking changes; review GitLab release notes before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in GitLab Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-1250 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-1250 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data