GitLabApplication

CVE-2025-12983

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-11-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 18.3.6 / 18.4.4 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 16.9 before 18.3.6, 18.4 before 18.4.4, and 18.5 before 18.5.2 that could have allowed an authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service condition by submitting specially crafted markdown content with nested formatting patterns.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

GitLab's markdown rendering engine has a denial of service vulnerability where authenticated users can submit specially crafted markdown content with nested formatting patterns (e.g., deeply nested bold, italic, or link syntax). This causes excessive computational resource consumption during markdown parsing, leading to service unavailability.

MitigationUpgrade GitLab to version 18.3.6, 18.4.4, 18.5.2 or later. This is a standard version upgrade with no configuration changes required.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
GitLabApplication
Affected:>= 16.9.0, < 18.3.6>= 18.4.0, < 18.4.4>= 18.5.0, < 18.5.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed GitLab version
    Run `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or check the version file at `/opt/gitlab/version` ( Omnibus) or look at the GitLab admin dashboard under Help > Version
    Affected if Version is 16.9.0 through 18.3.5, 18.4.0 through 18.4.3, or 18.5.0 through 18.5.1
  2. Compare version against CVE ranges
    Review the version identified in step 1 against the affected ranges: >= 16.9.0 and < 18.3.6; >= 18.4.0 and < 18.4.4; >= 18.5.0 and < 18.5.2
    Affected if The installed version matches any of these ranges
  3. Confirm markdown rendering is accessible
    Verify the GitLab instance has any feature enabled where authenticated users can submit markdown content such as issues, merge requests, comments, wikis, or markdown files
    Affected if Authenticated users can submit markdown (this is the default state in GitLab) and the version check in step 1 shows an affected version

You are affected if your GitLab version falls within the listed version ranges and your instance permits authenticated users to submit markdown content, which is the default configuration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 18.3.6 / 18.4.4 / 18.5.2 or later
Fixed in 18.3.618.4.418.5.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade GitLab to version 18.3.6, 18.4.4, 18.5.2 or later. This is a standard version upgrade with no configuration changes required.

Recommended fix High confidence

GitLab 18.5.2 (or 18.3.6 / 18.4.4 depending on your upgrade path)

  1. 1. Back up your GitLab instance database and repository data before proceeding
  2. 2. Ensure you are currently running an affected version (16.9.0 through 18.3.5, 18.4.0 through 18.4.3, or 18.5.0 through 18.5.1)
  3. 3. Plan maintenance window as upgrade will require service restart
  4. 4. For versions 16.9.x through 18.3.x: upgrade to GitLab 18.3.6 or later (but before 18.4.0)
  5. 5. For versions 18.4.x: upgrade to GitLab 18.4.4 or later (but before 18.5.0)
  6. 6. For versions 18.5.x: upgrade to GitLab 18.5.2 or later
  7. 7. After upgrade, verify GitLab is operational and test markdown rendering with various content
Caveat Check GitLab upgrade notes for your version range - major version jumps may have breaking changes or require intermediate upgrades

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in GitLab Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12983 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12983 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data