CVE-2025-13929
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 10.0 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to cause a denial of service by issuing specially crafted requests to repository archive endpoints under certain conditions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn unauthenticated denial of service vulnerability exists in GitLab CE/EE where specially crafted requests to repository archive endpoints can cause the service to become unavailable. The vulnerability affects all versions from 10.0 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.0.0, < 18.7.6>= 18.8.0, < 18.8.6>= 18.9.0, < 18.9.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed GitLab versionLog into the GitLab admin area and navigate to the version information page, or run 'gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info' from the server terminalAffected if The displayed version falls within 10.0.0 to 18.7.5, 18.8.0 to 18.8.5, or 18.9.0 to 18.9.1
-
Check project/repository visibility settingsIn GitLab admin panel, review the default project visibility setting under Admin Area > Settings > Visibility and access controls > Default project visibilityAffected if Default visibility is set to Public or Internal, allowing unauthenticated access to repositories
-
Verify archive endpoint accessibilityAttempt to access a repository archive URL (for example: https://your-gitlab-instance.com/group/project/-/archive/master/project-master.zip) without providing authentication credentialsAffected if The archive downloads or returns a valid response without requiring login
-
Confirm unauthenticated API accessUse a curl command to query the GitLab API without an authorization token, such as: curl -s https://your-gitlab-instance.com/api/v4/versionAffected if The API returns valid JSON responses without authentication, indicating the instance accepts unauthenticated requests
You are affected if your GitLab version is within the vulnerable range (10.0.0 to 18.7.5, 18.8.0 to 18.8.5, or 18.9.0 to 18.9.1) AND repository archive endpoints are accessible to unauthenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.7.618.8.618.9.2
Upgrade GitLab to version 18.7.6, 18.8.6, 18.9.2 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, consider restricting or rate-limiting unauthenticated access to repository archive endpoints as a temporary mitigation.
18.7.6, 18.8.6, or 18.9.2 (or the latest stable 18.x release)
- Identify the currently running GitLab version using the GitLab Rails console (gitlab-rails console) or the Admin Area UI
- If running a version < 18.7.6, plan upgrade to version 18.7.6 or later
- If running version 18.8.x, upgrade to version 18.8.6 or later
- If running version 18.9.x, upgrade to version 18.9.2 or later
- Follow the official GitLab upgrade documentation for your installation method (omnibus, source, or package manager)
- Ensure you have a complete backup before upgrading
- Test the upgrade in a staging environment before deploying to production
- After upgrade, verify the GitLab version matches the expected patched release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13929 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13929 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data