CVE-2025-1477
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 8.14 before 18.0.6, 18.1 before 18.1.4, and 18.2 before 18.2.2 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to create a denial of service condition by sending specially crafted payloads to specific integration API endpoints.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn unauthenticated remote denial of service vulnerability in GitLab CE/EE allows attackers to send specially crafted payloads to specific integration API endpoints, causing service disruption. The vulnerability affects versions from 8.14 through 18.0.5, 18.1.0-18.1.3, and 18.2.0-18.2.1.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.1.4, < 18.0.6>= 18.1.0, < 18.1.4>= 18.2.0, < 18.2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed GitLab versionRun 'sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:version' or check /opt/gitlab/version on the GitLab serverAffected if The version falls within 8.14 through 18.0.5, 18.1.0-18.1.3, or 18.2.0-18.2.1 (or equivalently: >= 8.1.4 and < 18.0.6, or >= 18.1.0 and < 18.1.4, or >= 18.2.0 and < 18.2.2)
-
Verify integration API endpoint exposureReview web server or firewall configuration to determine if integration API endpoints (such as /api/v4/integrations/*) are reachable from untrusted networksAffected if Integration API endpoints are accessible from the internet or untrusted internal networks without authentication
-
Check external access to GitLab instanceConfirm whether the GitLab web interface is exposed directly to the internet or accessible without authentication via reverse proxyAffected if The GitLab instance accepts unauthenticated HTTP/HTTPS connections from external sources
-
Identify enabled integrationsReview which integration modules are enabled in GitLab admin settings under /admin/integrations, or query the API at /api/v4/integrations with admin credentialsAffected if Any third-party integrations are enabled and their API endpoints are externally accessible
A user is affected if their GitLab version is within the vulnerable ranges AND the integration API endpoints are accessible to unauthenticated or external attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.0.618.1.418.2.2
Upgrade GitLab to version 18.0.6, 18.1.4, or 18.2.2 or later to patch the vulnerability. As a defensive measure, consider restricting external access to integration API endpoints via firewall or authentication proxies until the upgrade is completed.
Upgrade to GitLab 18.2.2 or later (latest stable release recommended)
- 1. Back up your GitLab instance data before proceeding with the upgrade
- 2. Review the GitLab upgrade documentation for your installation method (omnibus, source, or Docker)
- 3. Plan for appropriate downtime during the upgrade process
- 4. For Omnibus installations: run 'apt-get update && apt-get install gitlab-ce' or 'yum install gitlab-ce' depending on your OS
- 5. For Docker installations: pull and run the latest image with the fixed version tag (e.g., gitlab/gitlab-ee:18.2.2
- 6. After upgrade, verify GitLab is running: gitlab-rake gitlab:health
- 7. Test that integration API endpoints are functioning correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-1477 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-1477 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data