CVE-2025-2938
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.3 before 17.11.5, 18.0 before 18.0.3, and 18.1 before 18.1.1 that could have allowed authenticated users to gain elevated project privileges by requesting access to projects where role modifications during the approval process resulted in unintended permission grants.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAuthenticated users could exploit the project access request approval workflow in GitLab where role modifications during the approval process resulted in unintended elevated permissions, allowing privilege escalation beyond what was granted by administrators.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 17.3.0, < 17.11.5>= 18.0.0, < 18.0.3= 18.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed GitLab versionRun command: sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info or check /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gitlab-rails/VERSION file. Alternatively, visit Admin Area > Settings > General > GitLab configuration and look for the version number.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: >= 17.3.0 and < 17.11.5, OR >= 18.0.0 and < 18.0.3, OR exactly 18.1.0
-
Verify project access requests are enabledNavigate to Project > Settings > Members > Access requests. Alternatively, check via API: GET /projects/:id/settings or inspect the project JSON response for access_request_enabled field.Affected if Project access requests feature is enabled for any project in the GitLab instance
-
Check for pending access requests requiring approvalIn GitLab UI, go to Project > Settings > Members > Access requests section. Look for any users with 'Request to join' status pending approval. Or query via API: GET /projects/:id/access_requestsAffected if There are pending access requests that require approval actions from maintainers or administrators
-
Review approval workflow configurationExamine project settings at Project > Settings > Members > Access requests > Approval settings. Check if custom roles or permission modifications are allowed during the approval process.Affected if The approval workflow permits role/permission modifications during access request approval
You are affected if your GitLab version is one of the vulnerable versions listed AND you have project access requests enabled with pending approvals that can be processed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped17.11.518.0.3
Upgrade GitLab to version 17.11.5, 18.0.3, 18.1.1 or later to patch the privilege escalation vulnerability in the access request approval workflow.
GitLab 17.11.5 (or later 17.x LTS), 18.0.3, 18.1.1, or latest stable release
- 1. Back up your GitLab instance data and configuration before proceeding with any upgrade
- 2. Determine your current GitLab installation method (Omnibus, source, Docker, etc.)
- 3. Consult the official GitLab upgrade documentation for your installation method
- 4. Plan for appropriate downtime, as GitLab upgrades typically require service interruption
- 5. Upgrade to GitLab version 17.11.5 or later in the 17.x LTS track, OR version 18.0.3 or later, OR version 18.1.1 or later
- 6. After upgrade, verify the access request/approval workflow functions correctly and that permission grants behave as expected
- 7. Review admin audit logs to confirm no unauthorized privilege escalations occurred prior to the patch
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-2938 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-2938 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data