CVE-2025-4097
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 11.10 before 18.4.6, 18.5 before 18.5.4, and 18.6 before 18.6.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user to cause a denial of service condition by uploading specially crafted images.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn authenticated user could upload specially crafted images to GitLab CE/EE that trigger a denial of service condition. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation or resource limits during image processing, likely causing excessive memory consumption or processing loop when the malicious image is processed by the server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.10.0, < 18.4.6>= 18.5.0, < 18.5.4>= 18.6.0, < 18.6.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed GitLab versionRun `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or look at the GitLab admin area > Version. Alternatively, check the package version with `dpkg -l | grep gitlab` or `rpm -q gitlab-ce` depending on your package manager.Affected if The installed version falls within one of these ranges: >= 11.10.0 and < 18.4.6, OR >= 18.5.0 and < 18.5.4, OR >= 18.6.0 and < 18.6.2
-
Verify project file uploads are enabledNavigate to Project > Settings > General > Visibility, project features, permissions. Ensure Projects, issues, merge requests, and other features are not set to 'Private' only if you want to test. Check if the project allows upload of attachments via issues, merge requests, or the wiki.Affected if File or image uploads are enabled for at least some users (authenticated users can upload attachments to issues, merge requests, or as project files)
-
Check for upload size limitationsReview GitLab configuration in /etc/gitlab/gitlab.rb for `gitlab_rails['max_attachment_size']` or check the admin area under Settings > General > File uploads. Default is typically 10MB but may vary.Affected if No explicit file size limit is set, or the limit is set to an extremely large value that would not mitigate memory exhaustion from malformed images
-
Identify if image processing features are activeCheck if the GitLab instance processes uploaded images for preview thumbnails, which triggers the vulnerable code path. This occurs automatically when viewing project repositories or attachments that render as images.Affected if Users can view uploaded images in the GitLab web interface (issues, merge requests, repository view) - this triggers the image processing code
You are affected if your GitLab version is in the vulnerable ranges listed AND authenticated users can upload image attachments that are processed for preview by the server.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.4.618.5.418.6.2
Update GitLab to version 18.4.6, 18.5.4, 18.6.2 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, consider restricting or validating image uploads from untrusted users as a temporary workaround.
18.4.6 (for 11.10+ to 18.4.x), 18.5.4 (for 18.5.x), or 18.6.2 (for 18.6.x)
- Identify the currently installed GitLab version using `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or checking the GitLab admin panel
- Based on the current version, upgrade to the appropriate fixed release:
- - If running 11.10.0 to 18.4.x: upgrade to 18.4.6 or later
- - If running 18.5.0 to 18.5.x: upgrade to 18.5.4 or later
- - If running 18.6.0 to 18.6.x: upgrade to 18.6.2 or later
- Follow the standard GitLab upgrade procedure using gitlab-ctl repo-sync and gitlab-ctl upgrade, or use the official upgrade paths documented at docs.gitlab.com
- After upgrade, verify the new version is running with `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info`
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4097 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4097 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data