CVE-2025-4679
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in Synology Active Backup for Microsoft 365 allows remote authenticated attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSynology Active Backup for Microsoft 365 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that allows remote authenticated attackers to obtain sensitive information. The attack requires authentication, indicating the vulnerability likely involves improper access controls or data sanitization within the backup application. The specific attack vectors are unspecified in the advisory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Active Backup for Microsoft 365 is installedAccess Synology DSM and navigate to Package Center to verify if the Active Backup for Microsoft 365 package is installed. Alternatively, run the command 'grep -i "active backup" /var/log/synopkg.log' on the Synology NAS to check installation status.Affected if The package is listed as installed in Package Center or appears in the package logs.
-
Identify network exposure of the Active Backup serviceCheck Synology DSM under Control Panel > Security > Firewall to see if inbound rules allow access to ports used by Active Backup (typically ports 30000-30100 or custom ports). Also verify if the DSM is directly accessible from external IPs without VPN.Affected if Firewall rules permit untrusted or public IP addresses to reach the Active Backup service ports.
-
Review authentication logs for the backup portalIn Synology DSM, go to Log Center and filter logs for 'Active Backup' or 'ABM365' entries. Look for authentication events, especially from unfamiliar IP addresses or at unusual times.Affected if Logs show successful authentications from IP addresses that are not recognized or expected.
-
Check for unauthorized backup job modificationsIn Active Backup for Microsoft 365, navigate to the Task List and review all configured backup tasks. Verify that no new tasks were created or existing tasks modified without authorization.Affected if New or modified backup tasks exist that were not created by an authorized administrator.
-
Inspect user access controls on the backup serviceIn Active Backup for Microsoft 365, go to Settings > User Account Access or the equivalent permission panel. Review the list of users granted access to the backup service and confirm all are authorized personnel.Affected if Unrecognized user accounts or excessive permissions are assigned to the Active Backup service.
The environment is affected if Synology Active Backup for Microsoft 365 is installed and accessible to untrusted network users, regardless of version since all versions are vulnerable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor patch when available. Until then, restrict network access to the Active Backup service to trusted users only, and monitor for unauthorized access attempts using authentication logs.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4679 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4679 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data