dbcve.org
Baggage AnalyticsApplication · Sick

CVE-2025-49193

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.5 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The application fails to implement several security headers. These headers help increase the overall security level of the web application by e.g., preventing the application to be displayed in an iFrame (Clickjacking attacks) or not executing injected malicious JavaScript code (XSS attacks).

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The application is missing critical security headers that provide defense-in-depth protection against common web attacks. Specifically, headers to prevent clickjacking (e.g., X-Frame-Options or CSP frame-ancestors) and headers to mitigate XSS (Content-Security-Policy) are not implemented, allowing attackers to potentially inject malicious code or trick users into unintended actions.

MitigationConfigure the web server or application to return appropriate security headers including X-Frame-Options (or Content-Security-Policy with frame-ancestors) to prevent clickjacking, and Content-Security-Policy to restrict script execution and mitigate XSS attacks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Baggage AnalyticsApplication
Affected:all versions
Field AnalyticsApplication
Affected:all versions
Logistic Diagnostic AnalyticsApplication
Affected:all versions
Media ServerApplication
Affected:< 1.5
Package AnalyticsApplication
Affected:all versions
Tire AnalyticsApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify which Sick product is deployed
    Access the application's web interface or check running services/processes on the host. Look for product-specific identifiers in the web UI, service names, or documentation.
    Affected if The application is one of: Sick Baggage Analytics, Sick Field Analytics, Sick Logistic Diagnostic Analytics, Sick Package Analytics, Sick Tire Analytics (any version), or Sick Media Server (version below 1.5)
  2. Determine the installed version
    Check the application's about page, version info in the web UI, or check installed package/version information via the system package manager or application-specific CLI tools.
    Affected if The product is Sick Media Server and the version is below 1.5, or the product is any other affected product (all versions)
  3. Capture HTTP response headers from the web application
    Use a browser's developer tools (Network tab), curl -I <application-url>, or a proxy tool to capture the HTTP response headers from the application's main page or authenticated endpoints.
    Affected if Unable to retrieve headers indicates the application may not be running or accessible
  4. Check for clickjacking protection headers
    Inspect the HTTP response headers for the presence of X-Frame-Options header (any value such as DENY, SAMEORIGIN) OR Content-Security-Policy header containing 'frame-ancestors' directive.
    Affected if Neither X-Frame-Options nor CSP frame-ancestors directive is present in the response headers
  5. Check for XSS mitigation header
    Inspect the HTTP response headers for the presence of Content-Security-Policy header.
    Affected if Content-Security-Policy header is missing from the response headers

The environment is affected if the deployed product is any of the listed Sick products within the affected version ranges AND the HTTP response headers are missing both X-Frame-Options (or CSP frame-ancestors) and Content-Security-Policy headers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.5 or later
Fixed in 1.5
Interim mitigation

Configure the web server or application to return appropriate security headers including X-Frame-Options (or Content-Security-Policy with frame-ancestors) to prevent clickjacking, and Content-Security-Policy to restrict script execution and mitigate XSS attacks.

Fix this in Baggage Analytics Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49193 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49193 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data