CVE-2025-4979
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions before 17.10.7, 17.11 before 17.11.3, and 18.0 before 18.0.1. An attacker may be able to reveal masked or hidden CI variables (that they did not author) in the WebUI, by simply creating their own variable and observing the HTTP response.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in GitLab's CI/CD variable handling within the WebUI. An authenticated attacker can reveal masked or hidden CI variables that they did not author by creating their own variable and observing the HTTP response, bypassing proper authorization checks on variable access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 17.10.7>= 17.11.0, < 17.11.3= 18.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify GitLab versionRun command: `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or check the GitLab admin area under /admin/about to find the exact installed versionAffected if The installed version is < 17.10.7, OR >= 17.11.0 AND < 17.11.3, OR = 18.0.0
-
Confirm CI/CD variables are in useNavigate to a project is CI/CD settings page (Project > Settings > CI/CD > Variables) or use API: `GET /api/v4/projects/:id/variables` with a project that has variables definedAffected if CI/CD variables exist in any project on the GitLab instance
-
Review audit logs for variable access patternsCheck GitLab audit logs at Project > Security > Audit Events or use the API: `GET /api/v4/projects/:id/audit_events` filtered for event_type 'variable_access' or similar variable-related eventsAffected if There are audit events showing variable access by users who did not create those variables, indicating potential exploitation
-
Check for unauthorized variable creation attemptsReview audit logs for sudden spikes in variable creation events, especially from users with limited permissions, and compare against expected variable authorsAffected if Variable creation events exist where the creating user is not the expected project maintainer or owner
A GitLab instance is affected if it runs a version within the vulnerable ranges AND has CI/CD variables configured, with potential evidence of unauthorized variable access in audit logs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped17.10.717.11.3
Upgrade GitLab to version 17.10.7, 17.11.3, 18.0.1 or later. Prior to upgrading, restrict access to CI/CD variable settings and audit existing variable configurations for sensitive data exposure.
GitLab 17.10.7, 17.11.3, or 18.0.1 (recommended: 17.11.3 for 17.x line or 18.0.1 for 18.x line)
- Back up your GitLab instance database and repositories before starting the upgrade
- Schedule a maintenance window as GitLab upgrades typically require downtime
- Upgrade to GitLab 17.10.7, 17.11.3, or 18.0.1 (recommended: 17.11.3 or 18.0.1 for latest stable fixes)
- Run `sudo gitlab-ctl reconfigure` after upgrading the packages
- Verify the upgrade completed successfully by checking the GitLab version in the UI or via `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:version`
- Test that CI/CD variables are properly protected and cannot be disclosed via the described method
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4979 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4979 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data