CVE-2025-58579
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDue to a lack of authentication, it is possible for an unauthenticated user to request data from this endpoint, making the application vulnerable for user enumeration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn unauthenticated endpoint allows remote attackers to enumerate valid users by making requests without credentials. The lack of access control permits retrieval of user data that should require authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the user enumeration endpointLocate the API endpoint that exposes user data. Common paths in analytics platforms include /api/users, /api/userlist, /users, or similar REST endpoints. Check web server access logs for unusual patterns of requests to these endpoints.Affected if The endpoint responds to requests without requiring authentication headers or session tokens.
-
Test unauthenticated access to the user endpointSend a GET request to the suspected user enumeration endpoint (e.g., /api/users or /api/v1/users) using curl or a similar tool without including any authentication credentials. Observe the HTTP response code and body.Affected if The server returns HTTP 200 with user data, user lists, or user profile information instead of HTTP 401 (Unauthorized) or HTTP 403 (Forbidden).
-
Verify user data exposure scopeExamine the response from the unauthenticated request. Check if it contains sensitive user information such as usernames, email addresses, user IDs, roles, or other PII that should require authentication to access.Affected if The response includes any user-related data that should only be accessible to authenticated users.
-
Check for consistent access control failuresTest multiple different endpoints related to user management (e.g., /api/user/<id>, /api/users/search, /api/admin/users) without credentials to determine if the access control failure is widespread or limited to a single endpoint.Affected if Multiple user-related endpoints respond to unauthenticated requests with sensitive data.
Your environment is affected if any user-related endpoint returns user data or user lists to requests made without authentication credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authentication and authorization checks on the affected endpoint to ensure only authenticated users can access user data. Consider adding rate limiting to further mitigate enumeration attempts.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58579 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58579 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data