Sonoma D12 FirmwareOperating system · Endruntechnologies

CVE-2025-60969

MEDIUM · 5.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
61/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Directory Traversal vulnerability in EndRun Technologies Sonoma D12 Network Time Server (GPS) F/W 6010-0076-000 Ver 4.00 allows attackers to gain sensitive information.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · low confidence

Directory traversal vulnerability in the Sonoma D12 Network Time Server's web interface or API allows unauthenticated remote attackers to use '../' sequences in file path parameters to access files outside the web root directory, potentially exposing system configuration files, credentials, or other sensitive data.

MitigationImplement strict input validation on all file path parameters to reject directory traversal sequences; restrict web server process to its document root with proper chroot or sandboxing; apply vendor firmware patch when available; consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the NTP server management interface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Sonoma D12 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 6010-0076-000

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Access the device's web interface or check the device label/documentation to confirm it is an Endruntechnologies Sonoma D12 Network Time Server.
    Affected if The device is not a Sonoma D12 model.
  2. Check the installed firmware version
    Log into the device's web interface and navigate to the Status or System Information page to view the firmware version, or use the command-line interface if available to run 'show version' or similar.
    Affected if The firmware version is exactly 6010-0076-000.
  3. Verify the web interface is accessible
    Attempt to reach the device's web interface by entering its IP address in a web browser. Confirm the login page or status page loads.
    Affected if The web interface is accessible over the network.
  4. Confirm no input validation bypass is in place (optional manual check)
    If you have authorization, send a crafted HTTP request with a '../' sequence in a file path parameter (e.g., ../../../../etc/passwd) to an endpoint that accepts file path arguments. Check if the response contains content from outside the web root.
    Affected if The web interface returns file contents from outside the web root directory.

You are affected if the device is an Endruntechnologies Sonoma D12 with firmware version exactly 6010-0076-000 and its web interface is network-accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation on all file path parameters to reject directory traversal sequences; restrict web server process to its document root with proper chroot or sandboxing; apply vendor firmware patch when available; consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the NTP server management interface.

Fix this in Sonoma D12 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-60969 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-60969 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data