CVE-2025-6454
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 16.11 before 18.1.6, 18.2 before 18.2.6, and 18.3 before 18.3.2 that could have allowed authenticated users to make unintended internal requests through proxy environments by injecting crafted sequences.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in GitLab CE/EE where authenticated users can inject crafted sequences into requests, enabling them to make the GitLab server perform unintended internal network requests through configured proxy environments. This could allow access to internal services, metadata endpoints, or infrastructure that should not be exposed.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 16.11.0, < 18.1.6>= 18.2.0, < 18.2.6>= 18.3.0, < 18.3.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed GitLab versionRun `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or visit the GitLab admin panel under Help > Version to determine the exact version numberAffected if Version is 16.11.0 to 18.1.5, 18.2.0 to 18.2.5, or 18.3.0 to 18.3.1
-
Verify proxy configuration existsReview /etc/gitlab/gitlab.rb for proxy settings such as `gitlab_rails['http_proxy']` or check environment variables (HTTP_PROXY, HTTPS_PROXY) available to GitLab processesAffected if An HTTP/HTTPS proxy is configured for GitLab outbound requests
-
Confirm external webhook or integration features are accessibleCheck if any authenticated users have permissions to create or modify webhooks, service integrations, or import features that trigger outbound HTTP requestsAffected if Authenticated users can configure webhooks or integrations that cause GitLab to make outbound requests
-
Review network routing from GitLab serverExamine routing tables, firewall rules, or cloud security groups to determine if the GitLab server can reach internal network ranges or metadata endpointsAffected if GitLab server has the ability to initiate connections to internal network addresses or cloud metadata services
The environment is affected if running a GitLab version within the vulnerable ranges AND the server is configured to use a proxy AND can reach internal network resources that could be targeted via SSRF.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.1.618.2.618.3.2
Upgrade GitLab to version 18.1.6, 18.2.6, or 18.3.2 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, review and restrict proxy configurations and network access controls to limit potential internal reconnaissance.
18.3.2 (or 18.2.6/18.1.6 depending on your current version branch - recommend upgrading to 18.3.2 for latest fixes)
- 1. Back up your GitLab instance data and configuration before proceeding with the upgrade
- 2. Check your current GitLab version by running: gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info
- 3. For Ubuntu/Debian systems: sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install gitlab-ce=<version> or gitlab-ee=<version>
- 4. For RHEL/CentOS systems: sudo yum install gitlab-ce-<version> or gitlab-ee-<version>
- 5. Replace <version> with 18.1.6, 18.2.6, or 18.3.2 (choose the appropriate fixed version for your current version branch)
- 6. Run sudo gitlab-ctl reconfigure to apply the configuration changes
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking: gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info
- 8. Confirm the installed version shows the patched release (18.1.6, 18.2.6, or 18.3.2)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,312.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6454 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6454 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data