CVE-2025-6827
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in code-projects Inventory Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /php_action/editOrder.php. The manipulation leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA SQL injection vulnerability exists in the /php_action/editOrder.php file of the code-projects Inventory Management System 1.0. Attackers can exploit this by sending malicious SQL queries through unsanitized input parameters, potentially allowing unauthorized database access, data extraction, or full system compromise. The critical CVSS score of 9.8 reflects the ease of remote exploitation and potential impact.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed version of Code Projects Inventory Management SystemCheck the application for version information, typically in a README file, about page, or by examining application metadata. The affected version is 1.0.Affected if The installed version is 1.0
-
Locate the editOrder.php file in the applicationSearch for the file /php_action/editOrder.php in the web root directory of the deployed application.Affected if The file /php_action/editOrder.php exists in the application directory
-
Verify the application is accessible and runningConfirm the web application is deployed and accessible via HTTP/HTTPS. The SQL injection is remotely exploitable over the network.Affected if The application is deployed and accessible externally or internally
-
Inspect the editOrder.php code for unsanitized SQL parametersExamine the source code of editOrder.php and look for SQL query construction that uses direct user input (such as $_GET, $_POST variables) without parameterized queries or proper input sanitization.Affected if The code contains SQL queries using raw user input without prepared statements or input validation
Your environment is affected if you are running Code Projects Inventory Management System version 1.0 with the /php_action/editOrder.php file present and accessible, and that file contains SQL queries that accept unsanitized user input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImmediate remediation requires rewriting database queries in editOrder.php to use parameterized queries (prepared statements) with proper input validation. A thorough code audit of similar files is recommended as the exploit is publicly available.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6827 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6827 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data