CVE-2025-6828
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been found in code-projects Inventory Management System 1.0 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /orders.php. The manipulation of the argument i leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the code-projects Inventory Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to manipulate database queries via the 'i' parameter in /orders.php. The lack of parameterized queries or input sanitization enables attackers to inject arbitrary SQL statements, potentially leading to unauthorized data access, authentication bypass, or in some configurations, remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Code Projects Inventory Management System installationLocate the orders.php file in the web application's directory structure. Search for files containing 'inventory management' or 'orders' in the application root.Affected if The file /orders.php exists in the web root and belongs to Code Projects Inventory Management System version 1.0
-
Verify the application versionCheck for a version file, readme.txt, or footer/installation files that specify the software version. Common locations: /includes/version.php, /readme.txt, or check database schema files.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0 of Code Projects Inventory Management System
-
Inspect orders.php for vulnerable SQL handlingOpen orders.php and examine the code around the 'i' parameter usage. Look for SQL queries that directly incorporate the 'i' parameter without using prepared statements, parameter binding, or input sanitization functions such as htmlspecialchars or mysqli_real_escape_string.Affected if The code contains SQL queries that concatenate or embed the 'i' parameter directly into the query string without parameterized binding
-
Check database query implementationSearch the orders.php file for patterns like $_GET['i'], $_POST['i'], or $_REQUEST['i'] being used inside mysql_query, mysqli_query, or PDO query methods without prepare() or bindParam() calls.Affected if The 'i' parameter is extracted from request variables and passed directly to database query functions without preprocessing
-
Assess network accessibility of the vulnerable endpointVerify if the orders.php endpoint is accessible over the network. Check web server configuration and firewall rules to determine if unauthenticated users can send requests to /orders.php with the 'i' parameter.Affected if The orders.php file is accessible to unauthenticated remote users on the network
A user is affected if they are running Code Projects Inventory Management System version 1.0 with the orders.php file accessible, and that file contains direct SQL query construction using the 'i' parameter without prepared statements or input sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with prepared statements/parameterized queries, implement strict input validation on the 'i' parameter, and apply vendor patches if available. Restrict database permissions to limit impact of successful exploitation.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6828 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6828 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data