CVE-2025-9958
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 14.10 before 18.2.7, 18.3 before 18.3.3, and 18.4 before 18.4.1, that could have allowed Guest users to access sensitive information stored in virtual registry configurations.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGitLab CE/EE versions 14.10 through 18.4 before specified patches contained an improper access control vulnerability where Guest users could access sensitive information stored in virtual registry configurations. This allowed low-privilege users to view configuration data that should have been restricted to higher-privileged roles.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 14.10.0, < 18.2.7>= 18.3.0, < 18.3.3= 18.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed GitLab versionRun `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:version` or check the GitLab admin dashboard under Help > Version to obtain the exact version numberAffected if The installed version falls within >= 14.10.0 and < 18.2.7, OR >= 18.3.0 and < 18.3.3, OR equals 18.4.0
-
Verify if Container Registry is enabledCheck if the GitLab Container Registry feature is active by navigating to the admin area under Settings > Registry, or query the GitLab API endpoint `/api/v4/settings` and look for the `registry_enabled` parameterAffected if Registry is enabled and the GitLab version is within the affected ranges
-
Confirm virtual registry configuration existsExamine if any projects have virtual registry settings configured. This can be done via the GitLab API using `GET /api/v4/registries` with administrator credentials, or by reviewing project settings in the UI under Packages & Registries > Container RegistryAffected if Virtual registry configurations exist and the GitLab version is vulnerable
-
Test Guest user access to registry informationCreate or use a test account with Guest role and attempt to access registry configuration data via the GitLab API (`GET /api/v4/registries`) or through the web interface under registry-related pagesAffected if A Guest user can successfully retrieve registry configuration details that should only be visible to higher-privileged users such as Developers or Maintainers
You are affected if your GitLab version is 14.10.0 through 18.2.6, 18.3.0 through 18.3.2, or 18.4.0, and the Container Registry feature is enabled with virtual registry configurations accessible to Guest users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.2.718.3.3
Upgrade GitLab to version 18.2.7, 18.3.3, 18.4.1 or later to remediate the vulnerability. Alternatively, review and restrict Guest user permissions to registry configurations until patching can be completed.
18.2.7, 18.3.3, or 18.4.1 (or later stable releases)
- 1. Backup your GitLab instance database and repositories before proceeding with any upgrade
- 2. Determine your current GitLab version by running: sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info
- 3. Plan your upgrade path based on your current version - if below 18.2.7, upgrade to 18.2.7 or later; if at 18.3.0-18.3.2, upgrade to 18.3.3 or later; if at 18.4.0, upgrade to 18.4.1 or later
- 4. For GitLab installations using Omnibus: sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install gitlab-ce (or gitlab-ee) to install the latest available fixed version
- 5. For source installations: follow the upgrade documentation at https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/update/ to rebuild from the fixed release
- 6. After upgrade, run sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:check to verify the installation
- 7. Confirm the fix by verifying that Guest users can no longer access virtual registry configurations
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9958 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9958 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data