CVE-2026-12053
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 19.1 before 19.1.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed a user to access sensitive information that had already been committed to a project, due to insufficient output filtering in Duo Workflows.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGitLab EE versions 19.1 before 19.1.1 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the Duo Workflows feature. Due to insufficient output filtering, an authenticated user could under certain conditions access sensitive information that had already been committed to a project, even if they would not normally have authorization to view that content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 19.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed GitLab EE versionRun `gitlab-rake gitlab:version` or check the GitLab admin panel under Help > Version to determine the exact version numberAffected if The installed version is exactly 19.1.0 (no other versions are listed as affected)
-
Confirm the GitLab edition is Enterprise Edition (EE)Check the GitLab admin panel or run `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` to verify the editionAffected if The product is GitLab EE (this vulnerability affects only Enterprise Edition, not CE)
-
Determine if Duo Workflows is enabledCheck the GitLab instance settings under AI/ML settings or Duo settings in the admin panel, or inspect the gitlab_rails.rb configuration file for duo_workflows_enabled settingAffected if Duo Workflows feature is enabled on the instance (this is the vulnerable module)
-
Review audit logs for suspicious Duo Workflows accessSearch GitLab audit logs for events involving Duo Workflows and file/repository access, filtering for the time period since 19.1.0 deploymentAffected if Any audit entries show authenticated users accessing files through Duo Workflows that they would not normally have permission to view
You are affected if GitLab EE version is exactly 19.1.0 AND Duo Workflows feature is enabled, allowing authenticated users potentially unauthorized access to committed content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade GitLab EE to version 19.1.1 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Organizations should also review commit history for any unauthorized access during the vulnerable period.
19.1.1
- Verify current GitLab installation version using the GitLab Rails console or admin interface
- Plan maintenance window for the upgrade process
- Back up the GitLab database, repositories, and configuration files
- Consult official GitLab upgrade documentation for version 19.1.1
- Execute upgrade to GitLab version 19.1.1 following standard upgrade procedures
- Verify the upgrade was successful and GitLab is functioning properly
- Confirm the version number matches 19.1.1 in the admin interface
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-12053 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-12053 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data