CVE-2026-1387
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 15.6 before 18.6.6, 18.7 before 18.7.4, and 18.8 before 18.8.4 that could have allowed an authenticated user to cause Denial of Service by uploading a malicious file and repeatedly querying it through GraphQl.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceGitLab EE versions 15.6 prior to 18.6.6, 18.7 prior to 18.7.4, and 18.8 prior to 18.8.4 contain a Denial of Service vulnerability. An authenticated user can upload a specially crafted malicious file and repeatedly query it through GraphQL, causing the service to become unavailable.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 15.6.0, < 18.6.6>= 18.7.0, < 18.7.4>= 18.8.0, < 18.8.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed GitLab EE versionRun `gitlab-rake gitlab:version` or check the GitLab admin panel under /admin/application_settings or look at /opt/gitlab/version-manifest.txtAffected if The version is 15.6.0 to 18.6.5, 18.7.0 to 18.7.3, or 18.8.0 to 18.8.3 (these are the vulnerable ranges)
-
Verify GraphQL API is accessibleAttempt to access the GraphQL endpoint at /api/graphql (or /-/graphql) and confirm it returns a valid response rather than a 404Affected if GraphQL endpoint responds normally - the DoS requires GraphQL to be reachable
-
Confirm file upload functionality is enabledCheck if users can upload attachments or files through the GitLab web interface, API, or via merge request attachmentsAffected if File uploads are permitted - the attack requires uploading a malicious file that will be queried
-
Look for signs of DoS activityMonitor GraphQL query response times and error rates; check if the GraphQL service is unresponsive or timing out on repeated file queriesAffected if GraphQL queries to specific uploaded files cause service slowdown or unavailability
A user is affected if their GitLab EE version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND GraphQL API is accessible AND file uploads are enabled, as the attack requires both conditions to trigger the DoS.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.6.618.7.418.8.4
Upgrade GitLab EE to version 18.6.6, 18.7.4, 18.8.4 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, consider restricting GraphQL API access or rate-limiting GraphQL queries as a temporary mitigation.
Upgrade to GitLab 18.6.6 (if on 18.6.x), 18.7.4 (if on 18.7.x), or 18.8.4 (if on 18.8.x)
- 1. Identify the current GitLab version by navigating to the GitLab admin area or running `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info`
- 2. Determine which version branch you are on (15.6.x-18.5.x, 18.6.x, 18.7.x, or 18.8.x) to select the appropriate upgrade target
- 3. Create a full backup of the GitLab instance using `sudo gitlab-backup-create`
- 4. Stop GitLab services with `sudo gitlab-ctl stop`
- 5. Update the GitLab package repository and install the fixed version: For 18.6.x branch upgrade to 18.6.6; for 18.7.x branch upgrade to 18.7.4; for 18.8.x branch upgrade to 18.8.4 (e.g., `sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install gitlab-ee=18.6.6-ee.0` or equivalent for your package manager)
- 6. Reconfigure GitLab with `sudo gitlab-ctl reconfigure`
- 7. Restart GitLab services with `sudo gitlab-ctl start`
- 8. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version at Admin Area > Dashboard or running `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info`
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-1387 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-1387 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data