CVE-2026-1516
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.0.0 before 18.8.9, 18.9 before 18.9.5, and 18.10 before 18.10.3 that in Code Quality reports could have allowed an authenticated user to leak IP addresses of users viewing the report via specially crafted content.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an information disclosure vulnerability in GitLab's Code Quality reporting feature. An authenticated attacker could embed specially crafted content in Code Quality reports that, when viewed by other users, would leak those users' IP addresses to the attacker.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 18.0.0, < 18.8.9>= 18.9.0, < 18.9.5>= 18.10.0, < 18.10.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed GitLab versionNavigate to Admin Area > Overview > Dashboard, or use the help page (click the question mark icon and select 'Help' or 'Version'), or run `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` in the console. Look for the version number in the format 18.x.y.Affected if The version is 18.0.0 or higher but lower than 18.8.9, OR 18.9.0 or higher but lower than 18.9.5, OR 18.10.0 or higher but lower than 18.10.3.
-
Verify if Code Quality reports are being usedCheck if any projects have Code Quality reports enabled. In the GitLab UI, go to a project's Settings > CI/CD > General pipelines, or check the project's merge requests for Code Quality report artifacts. Alternatively, search the GitLab database: `SELECT project_id FROM ci_reports WHERE report_type = 'code_quality' LIMIT 10;` or list files in the artifacts storage directory.Affected if Any project has generated or is storing Code Quality reports (typically as JSON artifacts from CI/CD pipelines).
-
Check for Code Quality report artifacts in pipelinesNavigate to a project's CI/CD > Pipelines and look for recent pipeline runs. Check if any have 'Code Quality' as a job name. Or use the API: `GET /api/v4/projects/:id/pipelines` and check for code_quality jobs, or check the artifacts storage under /var/opt/gitlab/gitlab-rails/shared/artifact_storage/.Affected if Any pipeline jobs named 'code_quality' have run and produced artifacts.
-
Inspect Code Quality report file storageIf you have server access, locate the Code Quality report files. These are typically stored as `artifacts/code_quality/report.json` within project storage. Check the GitLab Rails logs for requests to `/projects/-/jobs/artifacts/*/file/artifacts/code_quality/*` or similar paths.Affected if Code Quality report JSON files exist in the system and have been accessed by users through the GitLab interface.
You are affected if your GitLab version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND you have projects that generate or display Code Quality reports, as the IP leakage occurs when users view these reports.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.8.918.9.518.10.3
Upgrade GitLab EE to version 18.8.9, 18.9.5, 18.10.3 or later. Alternatively, restrict access to Code Quality reports until the upgrade can be performed.
GitLab 18.10.3 or later (or 18.8.9+/18.9.5+ depending on your branch)
- 1. Back up your current GitLab installation and database
- 2. Identify your current GitLab version using `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info`
- 3. For GitLab 18.0.0 through 18.8.x: upgrade to version 18.8.9 or later
- 4. For GitLab 18.9.x: upgrade to version 18.9.5 or later
- 5. For GitLab 18.10.x: upgrade to version 18.10.3 or later
- 6. After upgrade, verify the instance is running using `gitlab-rake gitlab:check`
- 7. Test Code Quality report functionality to ensure the fix is working
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-1516 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-1516 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data