CVE-2026-1724
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.5 before 18.8.7, 18.9 before 18.9.3, and 18.10 before 18.10.1 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to access API tokens of self-hosted AI models due to improper access control.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an improper access control vulnerability in GitLab EE that allowed unauthenticated users to access API tokens configured for self-hosted AI models. The issue stemmed from insufficient access controls on AI model configuration endpoints, enabling exposure of sensitive authentication credentials without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 18.5.0, < 18.8.7>= 18.9.0, < 18.9.3= 18.10.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm GitLab edition is Enterprise EditionRun `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or check the UI at /help for the edition designation. This vulnerability affects only GitLab EE, not CE.Affected if The instance is running GitLab Community Edition (CE) rather than Enterprise Edition (EE)
-
Identify installed GitLab versionRun `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:git:version` or check the /help page in the GitLab UI. Compare the version number to the affected ranges: 18.5.0 through 18.8.6, 18.9.0 through 18.9.2, or exactly 18.10.0.Affected if The installed version falls within >= 18.5.0 and < 18.8.7, or >= 18.9.0 and < 18.9.3, or equals 18.10.0
-
Determine if AI model integrations are configuredNavigate to the AI model configuration settings in the GitLab admin UI (Admin Area > Model Registry > AI Gateway) or check for configured AI providers in the gitlab.rb/gitlab.yml configuration files.Affected if Self-hosted AI models or AI gateway endpoints are configured with API tokens or authentication credentials
-
Verify API token exposure via unauthenticated endpoint accessAttempt to access the AI model configuration API endpoint without authentication (e.g., GET /api/v4/ai_models, /api/v4/ai_settings, or similar endpoints) using an unauthenticated request via curl or a browser.Affected if The endpoint returns sensitive AI model API tokens or credentials without requiring authentication
A user is affected if running GitLab EE at a version within the affected ranges AND has self-hosted AI models configured with API tokens, AND those configuration endpoints are accessible without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.8.718.9.3
Upgrade GitLab EE to version 18.8.7, 18.9.3, 18.10.1 or later as specified in the official GitLab security advisory. Review and rotate any potentially exposed AI model API tokens as a precautionary measure.
18.8.7, 18.9.3, 18.10.1, or latest stable 18.x release (whichever corresponds to your current branch)
- 1. Identify the current GitLab version by running `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or checking the GitLab admin area
- 2. Create a full backup of the GitLab instance using `sudo gitlab-backup-create`
- 3. For GitLab versions >= 18.5.0 and < 18.8.7: Upgrade to version 18.8.7 or the latest 18.8.x stable release
- 4. For GitLab versions >= 18.9.0 and < 18.9.3: Upgrade to version 18.9.3 or the latest 18.9.x stable release
- 5. For GitLab version 18.10.0: Upgrade to version 18.10.1 or the latest 18.10.x stable release
- 6. After upgrade, verify the GitLab instance is operational and test that AI model integrations work correctly
- 7. Review audit logs to confirm no unauthorized access occurred prior to the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-1724 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-1724 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data