CVE-2026-1773
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIEC 60870-5-104 used in RTU500: Potential Denial of Service impact on reception of invalid U-format frame. Product is only affected if IEC 60870-5-104 bi-directional functionality is configured. Enabling secure communication following IEC 62351-3 does not remediate the vulnerability but mitigates the risk of exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe IEC 60870-5-104 protocol implementation in RTU500 products contains a vulnerability where reception of an invalid U-format frame can cause a Denial of Service condition. The U-format frames in IEC 60870-5-104 are used for activation/deactivation commands (STARTDT, STOPDT, TESTFR). The issue only manifests when bi-directional functionality is configured. Notably, IEC 62351-3 secure communication does not remediate the flaw, indicating the vulnerability is in the protocol parsing logic itself rather than in authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 12.7.1, <= 12.7.7>= 13.5.1, <= 13.5.4>= 13.6.1, <= 13.6.2>= 13.7.1, < 13.7.8= 13.8.1>= 12.7.1, <= 12.7.7>= 13.5.1, <= 13.5.4>= 13.6.1, <= 13.6.2>= 13.7.1, < 13.7.8= 13.8.1>= 12.7.1, <= 12.7.7>= 13.5.1, <= 13.5.4>= 13.6.1, <= 13.6.2>= 13.7.1, < 13.7.8= 13.8.1>= 12.7.1, <= 12.7.7>= 13.5.1, <= 13.5.4>= 13.6.1, <= 13.6.2>= 13.7.1, < 13.7.8= 13.8.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the RTU500 product modelLocate the device model identifier in the system information, administrative interface, or device labelingAffected if Device is not one of: RTU540, RTU560, RTU520, or RTU530
-
Determine the installed firmware versionAccess the firmware version through the device management interface or system status menuAffected if Version falls within any of these ranges: 12.7.1 to 12.7.7, 13.5.1 to 13.5.4, 13.6.1 to 13.6.2, 13.7.1 to 13.7.7, or equals 13.8.1
-
Check bi-directional IEC 60870-5-104 configurationReview the IEC 60870-5-104 protocol settings to determine whether bi-directional communication mode is enabledAffected if Bi-directional functionality is configured and active for the IEC 60870-5-104 protocol
Device is affected only if it is an RTU540/560/520/530 with an affected firmware version AND bi-directional IEC 60870-5-104 is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped13.7.8
Apply vendor-supplied firmware/software patch for RTU500; until patch available, consider disabling bi-directional IEC 60870-5-104 functionality if operationally feasible, though this may limit functionality. IEC 62351-3 provides only risk mitigation, not remediation.
Firmware version 13.7.8 or later for Rtu540/Rtu560/Rtu520/Rtu530
- 1. Log into the RTU device web interface or management console
- 2. Navigate to the firmware management or system update section
- 3. Download the firmware update from Hitachi Energy's official support portal (publisher.hitachienergy.com) for your specific RTU model (Rtu540, Rtu560, Rtu520, or Rtu530)
- 4. Upload the firmware version 13.7.8 or later to the device
- 5. Initiate the firmware update process and wait for completion
- 6. Verify the firmware version has been updated successfully
- 7. Restart the device if required
- 8. Confirm IEC 60870-5-104 functionality is operating normally after the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-1773 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-1773 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data