CVE-2026-2238
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.5 before 18.11.6, 19.0 before 19.0.3, and 19.1 before 19.1.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed an unauthenticated user to view confidential issue references on public projects due to improper authorization checks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceGitLab CE/EE contains an improper authorization vulnerability where unauthenticated users could potentially view confidential issue references on public projects under certain conditions. The issue stems from insufficient authorization checks in the issue reference handling logic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 17.5.0, < 18.11.6>= 19.0.0, < 19.0.3= 19.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify GitLab versionRun `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or check `/opt/gitlab/VERSION` file to determine the installed GitLab version.Affected if Version is >= 17.5.0 and < 18.11.6, OR >= 19.0.0 and < 19.1.1 (including 19.1.0)
-
Confirm public projects existAs an administrator, navigate to Admin Area > Projects or use the API endpoint `/api/v4/projects?membership=false&statistics=true&public=true` to list projects with public visibility.Affected if Any projects are set to Public visibility
-
Identify confidential issues in public projectsUse GitLab API `/api/v4/projects/:id/issues?confidential=true` on public projects, or check within each public project under Issues > Confidential issues to see if confidential issues exist.Affected if Public projects contain confidential issues with references to other issues or external trackers
-
Verify issue reference handlingReview the activity log or audit logs for unauthorized access to issue references in public projects. Check if unauthenticated requests to `/project/-/issues/<id>` expose confidential issue reference data.Affected if Unauthenticated users can access confidential issue references that should be restricted
The environment is affected if GitLab version falls within the vulnerable range AND public projects with confidential issues exist, allowing unauthenticated users to potentially view confidential issue references.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.11.619.0.3
Upgrade GitLab to version 18.11.6, 19.0.3, or 19.1.1 or later to apply the vendor patch.
18.11.6 (for 17.x/18.x users), 19.0.3 (for 19.0.x users), or 19.1.1 (for 19.1.0 users)
- 1. Back up your current GitLab installation and database
- 2. Ensure you are currently running one of the affected versions: 17.5.0 through 18.11.5, 19.0.0 through 19.0.2, or 19.1.0
- 3. For GitLab Omnibus installations: run 'sudo gitlab-ctl stop' to stop services
- 4. Update GitLab to the appropriate fixed version based on your current major version
- 5. For GitLab Omnibus: run 'sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install gitlab-ce' (or 'gitlab-ee') to install the patched version
- 6. After upgrade, run 'sudo gitlab-ctl reconfigure' to apply configuration
- 7. Run 'sudo gitlab-ctl start' to restart services
- 8. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the GitLab version in the UI or via 'sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2238 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2238 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data