CVE-2026-4868
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.8 before 18.10.7, 18.11 before 18.11.4, and 19.0 before 19.0.1 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an authenticated user to cause specific Duo AI workflows to run under another user's identity due to improper user identity resolution when triggering Duo AI workflow runners.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis GitLab EE vulnerability allows an authenticated user to impersonate another user when triggering Duo AI workflow runners due to improper user identity resolution. The issue stems from the workflow runner not correctly validating the authenticated user's identity before executing workflows, enabling privilege escalation through identity confusion.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 18.8.0, < 18.10.7>= 18.11.0, < 18.11.4= 19.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed GitLab versionRun 'gitlab-rake gitlab:version' or check via the GitLab UI at Help > Version, or query the API at /api/v4/versionAffected if The installed version falls within 18.8.0 to 18.10.6, 18.11.0 to 18.11.3, or exactly 19.0.0
-
Verify Duo AI workflow runners are enabledCheck GitLab settings under CI/CD > Runners or the Duo AI settings area for any configured workflow runnersAffected if Duo AI workflow runners are actively configured or have been used in the environment
-
Review workflow execution audit logs for identity anomaliesAccess GitLab audit logs (Admin Area > Audit Events or via the audit events API) and filter for Duo workflow execution events, looking for cases where the triggering user differs from the effective userAffected if Audit logs show workflow executions where the authenticated user identity does not match the expected user context, or unexpected user impersonation patterns exist
A GitLab instance is affected if it runs an affected version (18.8.0-18.10.6, 18.11.0-18.11.3, or 19.0.0) AND has Duo AI workflow runners enabled, with potential evidence in audit logs of identity confusion during workflow execution.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.10.718.11.4
Upgrade GitLab to version 18.10.7, 18.11.4, or 19.0.1 or later. Review Duo AI workflow execution logs to identify any unauthorized workflow runs that may have occurred under different user identities.
19.0.1 (or latest 19.x stable release)
- Identify your current GitLab version by checking the GitLab administration interface or running `gitlab-rake gitlab:version`
- Determine which release branch you are on (18.8-18.10, 18.11, or 19.0)
- Plan upgrade based on your current version: if on 18.8.x-18.9.x, upgrade to 18.10.7 or later; if on 18.11.x, upgrade to 18.11.4 or later; if on 19.0.0, upgrade to 19.0.1 or later
- Follow standard GitLab upgrade procedures for your installation method (omnibus, source, etc.)
- After upgrade, verify the GitLab version matches a fixed release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4868 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4868 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data