CVE-2026-6269
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 15.10 before 18.10.8, 18.11 before 18.11.5, and 19.0 before 19.0.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with developer-role permissions to modify hidden merge requests due to incorrect authorization enforcements.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGitLab CE/EE had an authorization bypass where authenticated users with developer-role permissions could modify hidden merge requests they should not have access to, due to incorrect authorization enforcement logic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 15.10.0, < 18.10.8>= 18.11.0, < 18.11.5>= 19.0.0, < 19.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed GitLab versionRun `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or check the GitLab admin panel under Help > Version. Alternatively, check the /opt/gitlab/version file.Affected if Version falls within >= 15.10.0 and < 18.10.8, OR >= 18.11.0 and < 18.11.5, OR >= 19.0.0 and < 19.0.2
-
Verify hidden merge requests feature is in useCheck if any projects have merge requests with the hidden/collapsed discussion setting enabled. In GitLab UI, navigate to a project's Merge Requests and look for MRs with hidden comments or navigate to Project Settings > Merge Requests to review settings.Affected if Hidden merge requests exist in the GitLab instance
-
Review developer role assignmentsCheck user memberships in projects or groups. Use GitLab API: `GET /projects/:id/members/all` or navigate to Project > Settings > Members to list users with Developer role.Affected if Users with Developer role exist who should not have access to certain hidden merge requests
-
Audit merge request authorization logsReview GitLab audit logs for merge request update events. Use the UI: Admin Area > Monitoring > Audit Events, or API: `/audit_events?entity_type=MergeRequest&action=update`. Look for unauthorized modifications.Affected if Audit logs show merge request modifications by users without proper access
You are affected if your GitLab version is within the vulnerable ranges AND hidden merge requests exist in your instance with users who may have had unintended write access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.10.818.11.519.0.2
Upgrade GitLab to version 18.10.8 and later, 18.11.5 and later, or 19.0.2 and later to apply the patched release.
Upgrade to GitLab 18.10.8, 18.11.5, or 19.0.2 or later (preferably latest stable 18.x or 19.x)
- 1. Back up your GitLab instance data before proceeding with the upgrade
- 2. Review GitLab upgrade documentation for your installation method (Omnibus, source, or Docker)
- 3. Plan maintenance window as upgrades may require downtime
- 4. For Omnibus installations: run 'gitlab-ctl upgrade' or download and install the appropriate package for your version
- 5. For source installations: follow the upgrade guide to install the specific patched version
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking GitLab version after restart
- 7. Confirm the fix is applied by testing that developer-role users can no longer modify hidden merge requests they shouldn't have access to
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6269 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6269 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data