CVE-2026-6713
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 18.2 before 18.10.7, 18.11 before 18.11.4, and 19.0 before 19.0.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed an unauthorized user to enumerate private projects due to incorrect authorization checks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceGitLab CE/EE versions 18.2 prior to 18.10.7, 18.11 prior to 18.11.4, and 19.0 prior to 19.0.1 contain an authorization flaw where incorrect permission checks under certain conditions allow unauthenticated or unauthorized users to enumerate private project names and metadata that should be concealed.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 18.2.0, < 18.10.7>= 18.11.0, < 18.11.4= 19.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed GitLab versionRun `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or check /opt/gitlab/version-manifest.txt to retrieve the exact version numberAffected if Version falls within 18.2.0 to <18.10.7, 18.11.0 to <18.11.4, or equals 19.0.0
-
Verify if private projects existAs an admin, run `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:git:fsck` or check the GitLab UI under Projects > Your Projects to see if any projects have visibility set to PrivateAffected if The instance contains private projects and the GitLab version is in the affected range
-
Test unauthenticated project enumerationAttempt to access private project endpoints via API without authentication: `curl -s https://gitlab-instance/api/v4/projects` or try to enumerate project IDs to see if private project names/metadata are returnedAffected if Private project names or metadata are returned to unauthenticated users when they should not be visible
If the GitLab version is in the affected range (18.2.x, 18.11.x, or 19.0.0) and private projects exist, the environment may be vulnerable to unauthorized project enumeration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.10.718.11.4
Upgrade GitLab to version 18.10.7 or later for 18.x branches, 18.11.4 or later for 18.11 branch, or 19.0.1 or later for 19.0 branch. The vulnerability has been remediated in these patched releases.
Upgrade to GitLab 18.10.7, 18.11.4, or 19.0.1 (or later versions within your release branch)
- Backup your GitLab instance data before proceeding with any upgrade
- Identify your current GitLab version by running `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or checking the GitLab admin area
- If running GitLab 18.2.0 through 18.10.6, upgrade to GitLab 18.10.7 or later
- If running GitLab 18.11.0 through 18.11.3, upgrade to GitLab 18.11.4 or later
- If running GitLab 19.0.0, upgrade to GitLab 19.0.1 or later
- For Omnibus installations, update using `apt-get update && apt-get install gitlab-ce` (or `gitlab-ee` for Enterprise Edition)
- For source installations, follow the upgrade instructions in GitLab documentation for your specific version
- After upgrade, verify the GitLab version with `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info`
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6713 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6713 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data