CVE-2026-7377
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.7 before 18.9.7, 18.10 before 18.10.6, and 18.11 before 18.11.3 that, in customizable analytics dashboards, could have allowed an authenticated user to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of other users' browsers due to improper input sanitization.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in GitLab Enterprise Edition's customizable analytics dashboards. An authenticated attacker could inject malicious JavaScript code through unsanitized input in the dashboard configuration. When other users view the compromised dashboard, the script executes in their browsers, potentially enabling session hijacking, data theft, or unauthorized actions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 18.7.0, < 18.9.7>= 18.10.0, < 18.10.6>= 18.11.0, < 18.11.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed GitLab versionRun `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or check the GitLab admin area under /help for the version numberAffected if The version falls within these ranges: >=18.7.0 and <18.9.7, OR >=18.10.0 and <18.10.6, OR >=18.11.0 and <18.11.3
-
Confirm GitLab edition is Enterprise EditionCheck the GitLab admin dashboard or run `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:git:version` - the vulnerability applies only to GitLab Enterprise EditionAffected if The installation is GitLab Enterprise Edition (EE) and the version is in the affected ranges above
-
Determine if analytics dashboards feature is accessibleLog in as a user with access to analytics features and navigate to any custom dashboard creation or editing interface under the Analytics sectionAffected if The customizable analytics dashboards feature is available and users can create or edit dashboard configurations
-
Inspect existing dashboard configurations for suspicious contentUse the GitLab API endpoint `/api/v4/analytics/dashboards` (if accessible with admin credentials) or manually review any dashboards you have access to for unusual script tags, javascript: URLs, or event handlers in dashboard fieldsAffected if Any dashboard configuration contains encoded or raw JavaScript code, script tags, or suspicious HTML elements that could execute code
You are affected if you run a GitLab Enterprise Edition version in the vulnerable ranges AND the customizable analytics dashboards feature is enabled and accessible to authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.9.718.10.618.11.3
Update GitLab to version 18.9.7, 18.10.6, 18.11.3 or later. As a defense-in-depth measure, review existing dashboard configurations for malicious payloads and consider implementing strict Content Security Policy (CSP) headers.
Upgrade to GitLab 18.9.7, 18.10.6, or 18.11.3 (or later)
- 1. Back up your current GitLab instance and database
- 2. Plan your upgrade path based on your current version: If on 18.7.x-18.9.x, upgrade to 18.9.7 or later; If on 18.10.x, upgrade to 18.10.6 or later; If on 18.11.x, upgrade to 18.11.3 or later
- 3. For GitLab installations using the official omnibus package, run: sudo gitlab-ctl stop && sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install gitlab-ce (or gitlab-ee)
- 4. For source installations, follow the upgrade guide for your specific installation method
- 5. Run sudo gitlab-ctl reconfigure after upgrade
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking GitLab version with: sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info
- 7. Test the customizable analytics dashboards to confirm the XSS vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7377 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7377 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data